2015 Sustainable Development & Corporate Responsibility Report

GRI-G4 INDICES

Tables’  Reference Symbols

  the Annual Report 2015, at: http://www.helpe.gr/en/media-center/company-publications/annual-report/

  the Annual Financial Report for fiscal year 2015, at: http://www.helpe.gr/en/media-center/company-publications/annual-financial-report-for-fiscal-year/

  this Sustainable Development and Corporate Responsibility Report 2015

  the Group’s Code of Conduct, at: http://www.helpe.gr/en/media-center/company-publications/rest-group-publications/

  the Group’s Internal Labor Regulations (available only at intranet).

GRI
Brief Description
Ext. Assurance
Reference at/ Additional comments

Strategy and Analysis

G4-1

Provide a statement from the most senior decision-maker of the organization about the relevance of sustainability to the organization and the organization’s strategy for addressing sustainability

 p. 6-7, 13

 p. 26-29, Ch. "Our Vision, Strategy and Objectives’’, Section "Sustainable Development Strategy 2016-2021’’

 p. 156-157 (Strategic Goals and Prospects)

G4-2

Provide a description of key impacts, risks, and opportunities

 Financial risk management  p. 32-38
        Business Environment  p. 136-139
        Business Review  p. 140-141
        Review by Segment  p. 141-146
        Risk Management  p. 49-152  & 157-159
        Strategic Goals and Prospects p. 156-157

 p.  13-14 (Strategic Objectives 2013-2017),
        p. 65-69 (Risk Management)

 p. 34, Ch. "Corporate Governance and Regulatory Compliance’’, Section "Internal Audit and Risk Management’’ 

 

For main impacts, risks and opportunities for the Environment (due to climate change): see indicator G4-EC2.

The Group’s companies, locally, evaluate opportunities and risks:

ΕΚΟ and HF

The EKO’s and HF’s risk management system is designed to identify and manage potential threats and opportunities that arise, promptly and efficiently.
One of the short-term risks, both EKO and HF frequently encounter is the competition received from other oil marketing companies and independent  fuel stations that handle fuels of low quality. However, both EKO and HF are following their own marketing strategy; based on leading quality fuels and excellent fuel level of service; ensuring competitive advantage and value to their customers.
The instability in the national economy constitutes an significant short- and long-term risk for EKO and HF, and calls into question the viability of customers and suppliers and hinder trade. Both companies cope with difficult economic conditions supported in fixed structures and flexible mechanisms to deal with temporary and long-term events. In imposing capital controls in the summer of 2015, EKO and HF responded successfully giving to their customers the possibility to pay by POS, in ever-increasing part of the service network.

 

HP CYPRUS

The new VTTV terminal at Vasiliko (on the south coast between Larnaca and Limassol) with a capacity of 550,000m3 of white products has commenced operationsThe new Petrolina terminal (local oil company – 80,000m3) is also operational. 120,000m3 of Cyprus strategic reserves have been relocated from Larnaca to VTTV.
It is more than evident that the operation of these two terminals will increase the pressure by the government to the oil companies which own terminals at Larnaca to close down their terminals and relocate to Vasilico.
Furthermore the possible storage of product stocks by various international traders at VTTV, may pose a threat to HPC and the other existing marketing companies.
In addition the government is stepping up the pressure for the relocation of the LPG terminals from Larnaca.  The four LPG companies, with terminals at Larnaca, have conducted and submitted to the government a feasibility study regarding the construction and operation of a new LPG terminal facility at Vasilico.

Opportunities

  • Further development of COMO Network.
  • Introduction of Loyalty programs.
  • Strengthening the brand awareness through marketing activities and marketing of the EKO new product line (UL Ekonomy , EKO Racing 98, AVIO diesel etc).
  • Optimization of petrol stations network.

Risks

  • The White Flag Petrol Stations in the market and the expansion of competition in building new Petrol Stations is a threat in the diluting margins and ATPs.
  • In case where trade barriers are lifted with the occupied areas there might threats as to competitiveness.
  • The introductions of Autogas has unforeseeable effects on the automotive fuels

 

ΟKΤA

OKTA’s sustainable profitability depends on its ability to remain competitive in a market where barriers to entry are low, while at the same time it manages its facilities and installations as efficiently as possible, in order to maintain its role as a secure supplier. OKTA has the possibility to increase its market share by exploiting its infrastructure and the competitive terms it maintains with its suppliers. Additionally, OKTA seeks to increase its profitability by completing a number of transformation projects already launched and affecting its operations and organizational structure.
OKTA’s transformation to a trading company has emphasized the importance of the commercial targets in its strategy.
In that context the commercial objectives set for 2015 were increase of market share, enhancement of competitiveness, training and development of the commercial team, as well as recapturing share of independent PS networks. In addition to this profitability augmentation from the retail network and exploration of possible synergies with other EKO networks were the goals for OKTA’s retail activities.

The short term opportunities for OKTA are:

  • Pipeline utilization
  • Introduction of strategic reserves fee
  • Spare storage capacity, largest in the country
  • Improve loading installations
  • Focus on efficiency
  • Creating access to retail market through organic growth (DODO->COMO, retail know-how and EKO offerings)
  • Country strategic reserve levels set to increase

The short term challenge for OKTA are:

  • Full or partial loss of  the biggest customer
  • Waking up of strong competition in the wholesale market
  • Re-emergence of cheap product from competitive refinery
  • Oversupplied region
  • Lack of controls in both markets the company operates (FYROM and Kosovo)
  • Limited growth of the economy
  • Long lasting political crisis

 

EKO BULGARIA

No significant changes in the legal and economic environment that could lead to influence over the company’s sustainability and stakeholders. Political environment is stable, macroeconomic indexes remained within the frame of the prognosis.

Strategic Risks:

  • Intensified Competition and aggressive regional pricing;
  • Market Margins decline;
  • Losing opportunities due to limited storage capacity;
  • Diversion of consumer needs to other forms of energy (long-term);
  • BGN devaluation (long-term);
  • A change of the WS strategy of the local refinery focused on enlarging their market-share will affect significantly and negatively our volumes and margins.
  • An eventual slow-down of the GDP growth in Bulgaria will result in stagnation of our sales and higher level of competition with a potential of depressed margins, especially of diesel fuel.
  • The further development of storage/logistics infrastructure of local WS companies allowing for increased import will intensify the competition.

Opportunities:

  • Elimination of the grey infrastructure  & ongoing consolidation in the fuel sector;
  • Organic & Non-organic (by adding petrol stations) potential growth;
  • Gara Yana installation upgrade to LPG Depot; a further development into white fuels will boost our sales options in the west part of the country.
  • Switch to own or rented depot operations mode for light fuels;
  • Diversification of the product portfolio;
  • Further development of the C&I  and Lubricants business;
  • Further development of the NFR business (petrol stations’ minimarkets);
  • Expected cease of bitumen production in Lukoil Bourgas refinery provides excellent opportunity to expand our market presence in the segment and close other supply options at an early stage.
  • The development of competitive alternative supply points/sources will provide the grounds for enlarging the geography of our sales and improve our margins.
  • The PP market (polypropylene) growth provides opportunities to increase sales volumes.

 

EKO SERBIA

EKO retail network is among the 4 strongest in oil industry in SERBIA, considered as innovative and fast reacting to market needs. Market perception of EKO Serbia is that it is international brand, dynamic, modern company, implementing novelties trough network of retail sales, providing benefits to customers, value for money products and services.

Short term opportunities:

  • Further exploit of lubricant business
  • Expand penetration of high margin products (fuel and NFR)
  • Reduction of OpEx

Long term opportunities:

  • Network expansion
  • Increase brand value through dynamic marketing activities
  • Exploit opportunities related to new supply routes, depots for w/s business

Short term risks:

  • Supply dependence on NIS
  • Ability to remain competitive in w/s business

Long term risks:

  • Macroeconomic deterioration
  • Implementing aggressive network expansion plan

EKO Serbia still has potential to grow, to increase market share and higher margin fuel sales share among product portfolio, as well to become No. 3 in the market through extension of distribution network.

 

JUGOPETROL

Retail Market is heavily regulated; almost all petrol stations offer same prices. Some white flaggers, from time to time, have tried offering lower prices but main competitors don’t follow suit.
Wholesale market is highly competitive; competition from both regional oil companies (INA and Petrol) and “guerrilla” low quality imports by trucks from neighboring countries, especially Albania.
New rule book on fuel quality was published in January as Government is trying to improve controls on fuel imports and internal distribution.

Organisational Profile

G4-3

Report the name of the organization

HELLENIC PETROLEUM Group

 p. 75 and front cover

 p. 108

G4-4

Report the primary brands, products, and services

 p. 61-62, Ch. "Business Partners’’, Section "Customers – Products’’

 p. 132-135

 p. 29-44

G4-5

Report the location of the organization’s headquarters

8A Chimarras str., 151 25 Maroussi, Greece

 p. 75 and front cover

G4-6

Report the number of countries where the organization operates, and names of countries where either the organization has significant operations or that are specifically relevant to the sustainability topics covered in the report

 

 p. 97  (Ch. "Sustainability Standards and Assurance’’, Section "Report’ Boundaries’’, Table "Group’s companies presented in the Report’’), p. 61-62, (Ch. "Business Partners’’, Section "Customers-Products’’)

 p. 8, 37-38

Group’s companies included in this Report and countries with significant operations:

1 HELPE Greece
EKO
HF
DIAXON
ASPROFOS
2 OKTA AD SKOPJE fYROM
3 HP CYPRUS Cyprus
4 JUGOPETROL Montenegro
5 EKO BULGARIA Bulgaria
6 EKO SERBIA Serbia

 

G4-7

Report the nature of ownership and legal form

HELLENIC PETROLEUM Group,

HELLENIC PETROLEUM SA

 p. 16-18

 p. 162

Major shareholders (>5%)

(as of 31/12/2015) %
Greek State 35.5%
Paneuropean Oil and Industrial Holdings S.A. 42.6%
Institutional Investors (Greek) 8.5%
Institutional Investors (Foreigners) 5.3%
Retail Investors 8.1%

 

G4-8

Report the markets served (including geographic breakdown, sectors served, and types of customers and beneficiaries)

 p. 8, 37-38

 p. 97  (Ch. "Sustainability Standards and Assurance’’, Section "Report’s Boundaries’’, Table "Group’s companies presented in the Report’’), p. 61-62, (Ch. "Business Partners’’, Section "Customers-Products’’),  see also  G4- 6

The following Table, indicatively for 3 companies, presents sales breakdown per type of customer:

Sales breakdown by customer type

CUSTOMER ΕΚΟ HF JUGOPETROL HP CYPRUS
Service stations 36.00% 89.27% 44.4% 60.5%
Industrial customers 19.62% 10.71% 12.6% 14.4%
3rd party petrol stations     25.7%  
LPG 2.23%     5.5%
Shipping fuels 26.66%   5.2% 13.5%
Aviation fuels 14.97%   12.1% 5.9%
Lubricants 0.52% 0.02%   0.2%

 

G4-9

Report the scale of the organization, including:

  • Total number of employees
  • Total number of operations
  • Net sales
  • Total capitalization broken down in terms of debt and equity
  • Quantity of products or services provided

 p. 11-14, 40, 140-145 

 p. 10-11, 25-44, 65-73

p. 68-71, Ch. "Financial Performance’’

  Employees as of 31.12.2015 Net sales Total capitalization Quantity of products provided opex Labor cost
ΟΚΤΑ 417 € 323.4 m. equity € 66.1 m, net debt €15.8 m. 661,000 ΜT €9.994m €5.4m
HP CYPRUS 53

€288.369 m.

equity € 52.453 εκ., net debt € 0.0 m. 365,000 ΜΤ €20.48m €4.4m
EKO BULGARIA 56 €350.5 m. E1quity € 30.8 εκ., net debt €28.5 m. 374,700 ΜΤ €16.2m €1.1m
EKO SERBIA 35

€172.7 m.

equity  €17  m.,

net debt €28.0 m.

126,140 ΜΤ €10.6m €1.3m
JUGOPETROL 142

€ 172.752 m.

equity  €86.983 m.,  net debt €0 m.

209,070 ΜΤ €10.51m €3.1m
HELPE 1877 €8,750 m. equity €1,177 m, debt €2,771 m.

15.091 εκ MT

(Refining + Petrochemicals)

€558.6m €162.2m
ΕΚΟ 271 €1,665 m. equity € 156 m. debt € 170 m. 2.351  εκ MT €60m €16m
HF 201 € 579 m. equity €97.6 m.,  debt € 88 m 0.741 εκ MT €48m €11m

 

G4-10

a. Report the total number of employees by employment contract and gender.

b. Report the total number of permanent employees by employment type and gender.

c. Report the total workforce by employees and supervised workers and by gender.

d. Report the total workforce by region and gender.

e. Report whether a substantial portion of the organization’s work is performed by workers who are legally recognized as self-employed, or by individuals other than employees or supervised workers, including employees and supervised employees of contractors.

f. Report any significant variations in employment numbers (such as seasonal variations in employment in the tourism or agricultural industries).

  p.  41-43 , (Ch. "The Human Capital’’, Tables with Employees Breakdowns)

Normally there are no seasonal workers. EKO is an exception because of staff seasonal changes (fixed term contracts) at the premises of airports. 
Self-employed employees 0.

Workforce breakdown by gender & employment contract:

GROUP (Workforce breakdown by gender & employment contract):

Contract type M F Total
Indefinite 2644 630 3274
Fixed time 37 40 77
Full time 2681 669 3351
Part time 0 1 1

Detailed workforce breakdowns by gender & employment contract:

Contract type HELPE ΕΚΟ HF ASPROFOS
M F M F M Γ Α Γ
Indefinite 1700 230 174 97 126 58 94 57
Fixed time 11 5 1 0 14 8 0 0
Part time 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

 

Contract type DIAXON EKO BULGARIA JUGOPETROL EKO SERBIA HP CYPRUS ΟΚΤΑ
M F M F M F M F M F M F
Indefinite 81 15 31 25 56 32 13 24 37 18 332 74
Fixed time 0 0 0 3 10 18 0 0 0 0 1 6
Part time 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Contracted personnel 81 15 31 28 65 51 0 0 0 0 14 17

The Group’s companies, in order to cover specific needs (such as administrative work, financial or technical support) employ contracted / self-employed personnel.
In case of such contracted personnel there is a relevant reference in the above tables. Indicative activities delegated to contracted / self-employed personnel are:

  • Ancillary and support work related to packaging
  • Industrial facilities cleaning
  • Utility maintenance
  • Secretarial support
  • Cleaning of offices
  • Security services
  • Gardening
  • Informatics support, electrician issues 
G4-11

Report the percentage of total employees covered by collective bargaining agreements

 

 p. 57, Ch. "The Human Capital’’, Section"Human Rights”

Number of employee unions (per company) and percentage of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements (on average 87%):

Company No %
HELPE 1 92%
ΕΚΟ 1 83.1%
HF 1 81.1%
ASPROFOS 1 95%
DIAXON 1 96%
EKO BULGARIA - 100%
JUGOPETROL 1 100%
OKTA 1 97.1%
HP CYPRUS 3 49.1%
EKO SERBIA N/A
G4-12

Describe the organization’s supply chain

 p. 32

 p.  59-60, Ch. "Business Partners’’, Section "Supply Chain/ Responsible Procurements’’

We are an energy Group and thousands of suppliers are engaged in our supply chain; regarding products and services required to operate our industrial facilities & serve our customers in our diverse areas of operation.
We maintain a complex inflow of materials, equipment, services, transportation and IT, communications and other technology support systems.
We try to extend our purchases from local suppliers (see relevant Tables at Section "Local Societies’’, p. 93). Typical partners of our supply chain are: suppliers of: raw material (crude oil, chemicals), industrial equipment and materials, IT equipment and services, industrial services, local SME, general goods and services, of land/sea transportation services.
The ability to access and the flexibility of the Group’s refineries to process a wide range of crude oil types constitute one of its main competitive advantages. Crude oil supply is centrally coordinated and carried out through both term contracts and spot transactions. In 2015, crude oil market was oversupplied with all types of crude oil. HELLENIC PETROLEUM adjusted its crude slate accordingly:

Supply of crude by source 2012 2013 2014 2015
Russia 32% 54% 41% 33%
Iran 32%      
Iraq 5% 12% 18% 28%
Caspian Pipeline Consortium 12% 11%    
Libya 7% 9% 2% 2%
Egypt     9% 9%
Kazakhstan     22% 20%
Other 12% 14% 9% 8%
G4-13

Report any significant changes during the reporting period regarding the organization’s size, structure, ownership, or its supply chain

 p. 98,  Ch. "Sustainability Standards and Assurance’’, Section  "Methodology’’

There have been no significant changes in size, structure or ownership.

OKTA: 

Refining operation was stopped in January 2013. The company has managed to transform from an inflexible  heavy industry into a flexible, customer-focused logistics and trading company. During 2015 there were no changes in the share capital structure or in its capital formation or in its operations structure.

 

HP CYPRUS:

Opening of three new service stations. The circle of suppliers widened through collaboration with the Group’s Procurement Division. Also the Group Procurement Department provided their support during  the process of evaluation of tenders with high cost.

 

EKO Serbia:

EΚΟ Serbia opened 2 new COMO PS (1 central region and 1 in south region).

Commitments to external initiatives

G4-14

Report whether and how the precautionary approach or principle is addressed by the organization

 p.  75, Ch. "Environment, Energy and Climate Change’’, Section "Installations Certifications’’, Table "Certification of Group’s facilities’’, see also G4-2 for risk management 

The proactive approach and the precautionary principle are essentially assured by the risk assessment, the implementation of international standards and the resulting inspections, 1st party audits planned by GHSED  & Internal Auditing, regular external inspections.

Regarding the use of chemicals, the required Risk Management Measures are recorded for each identified use, based on the corresponding exposure scenarios that are developed in order to reduce or avoid direct and indirect exposure of humans (workers and consumers) and the different environmental systems. Risk management measures are implemented within the premises of HELLENIC PETROLEUM and communicated to downstream users through extensive safety data sheets of products.

The scheduled public opinion surveys, the employees’ – partners’ –customers’ satisfaction surveys, the risk assessment (G4-2) and the quality, environmental, health and safety policies confirm a proactive approach.

 

Moreover:

HP CYPRUS: with the adoption of international standards/management systems διαχείρισης (CYS EN ISO 9001:2008, CYS EN ISO 14001:2004 & OSHAS  18001: 2007,on 8/4/2005) HPC ensures the safe and professional conduct of its operations. Risk assessments are conducted for all the main operations at the facilities and retail stations.

 

OKTA’s modus operandi towards precautionary approach include:

  • Waste Management Programme 2016-2018 submitted to relevant Authorities
  • Continuous  monitoring of air emissions
  • Monitoring of the quality of underground waters and water management plan (in progress)
  • Management of PCB from transformers oil
  • Revision of risk assessment of job position
  • Health preventive medical check-ups (periodical and systematic) according to Risk assessment of job positions
  • Steady organization adaptation and education of the personnel in order to attain maximum effect in HSE through monthly drills in accordance with different fire scenarios in cooperation with Directorate for protection and rescue.
  • Risk assessment from natural disasters and other accidents - qualitative and quantitative analysis of data and possible risks for occurring natural disasters and other accidents, prediction of further development of events and consequences
  • Plan for safety and rescue based on the risk assessment for natural disasters, current, operational and technological risks, safety risks including Incident management team and respond forces.
  • Rulebook for safety from fire and explosions
  • Seveso Study
  • Cleaning of sludge pools

Furthermore, HR applies the "precautionary principle" in all its areas of operation (HR planning, selection and recruitment, training & development, succession planning, evaluation, reward) to prevent any risks of its areas of operation.

Acting precautionary all employees of Operations that are performing any kind of work (including inspection) in explosive atmospheres were trained according to EN 60079 – 17 “Explosive atmospheres’’. Electrical installations inspection and maintenance” and EN 60079 – 19 “ Explosive atmospheres. Equipment repair, overhaul and reclamation”.

In the area of procurement, "the precautionary principle" is one of the basic principles of operations and included in the formulation of specific procurement strategy, giving particular consideration to smooth and uninterrupted supply under the best economic conditions and always in accordance with the approved procurement manual.

 

EKO BULGARIA:

Ongoing approaches (such as training, competitive pricing and promotional activities) ensure that our partners comply with corporate policy and regulations, confirm the loyalty of our customers and improve sales methods. Regular test of fuel samples, in independent laboratories, confirm the quality of the products.

Regular weekly trainings of the employees concerning the emergency situations response.

 

EKO Serbia is present on Serbian market for 13 years and in this period beside network building has introduced many novelties in terms of products and services. Before any  implementation following steps are required:

  • Defining responsible person/team for certain projects
  • Deep analysis of the market request and need for product or service
  • Economic view of the project, investment, ROI, sources needed
  • Organizing pilot project when and if possible
  • Evaluation of project results and measurement and revision after it start
  • Further monitoring and development of a standard  operating procedures for new project in order to have business case for next to come
G4-15

List externally developed economic, environmental and social charters, principles, or other initiatives to which the organization subscribes or which it endorses

 p. 75, (Table "Certification of Group’s facilities’’ presents the standards voluntarily adopted by the Group and the adoption dates).

 P. 54

The adoption and implementation of international standards, codes and best practices constitutes a dynamic approach to the study of potential risks. These standards, codes and practices, that  are fully aligned with the strategic objectives of the Group, we are committed to apply,  diffuse and integrate them into all our operations and policies.

Indicatively, these standards and codes include:

Mandatory commitments:

• ETS (EU ETS) (Protocol of Kyoto, 1997 - in force since 2005), only to the Group’s refineries in Greece
 

Voluntary initiatives:

  • Initiative  "SustainableGreece2020’’ - Charter for Sustainable Greece Signed on 29.04.2014 (www.sustainablegreece2020.com). The initiative  (which is under the auspices of the Greek Ministry of Development & Competitiveness as well as the Greek Ministry of Environment, Energy and Climate Change) was developed with the cooperation of 33 Business Associations, 120 Companies,17 Local Authorities and 43 Organizations of the Civil Society. It is endorsed by International Organizations such as the European Commission, the German Sustainability Council, the World Business Council for Sustainable Development and the EIRISThe Group participates in the Initiative as SUSTAINABILITY AMBASSADOR, http://www.sustainablegreece2020.com/gr/ambassador/ellhnika-petrelaia.152.html. The participation in the initiative includes the adoption of Greek Sustainability Code, http://greekcode.sustainablegreece2020.com/ as well as the promotion of good sustainable development practices in Sustainability Observatory http://observatory.sustainablegreece2020.com/
  • Global Reporting Initiative (GRI G4 indicators) as well as the specific Oil & Gas Sector Supplement. Adopted by the Group in 2008.
  • United Nations’ Global Compact (UNGC) principles & criteria. Adopted by the Group in 2007.
G4-16

List memberships of associations (such as industry associations) and national or international advocacy organizations

The Group, in the context of its operation and the implementation of its strategy for sustainable development, ccooperates with its stakeholders participating in organizations, associations, institutions, etc. The Group funds and /or participates in administrative bodies of  associations and organisations.

HELPE considers part of its strategy for sustainable development, the active participation of the following organizations:

Environmental and Sustainability Organizations

  • CONCAWE (scientific section of the European Refineries Organization FuelsEurope)
  • the HFE’s Council for Sustainable Development
  • the HFE’s Committees on HSE

Industry Organizations

  • FuelsEurope
  • Hellenic Association of Chemical Industries (participates in the BoD)
  • EPSC (European Process Safety Center)

The Group  has no additional financial participation in these organizations, apart from annual membership dues.

Identified material aspects & boundaries

G4-17

a. List all entities included in the organization’s consolidated financial statements or equivalent documents.

b. Report whether any entity included in the organization’s consolidated financial statements or equivalent documents is not covered by the report.

 p. 165-168

 p. 97,  (Ch. "Sustainability Standards and Assurance’’, Section "Report’s Boundaries’’) 

G4-18

a. Explain the process for defining the report content and the Aspect Boundaries.

b. Explain how the organization has implemented the Reporting Principles for Defining Report Content.

 p. 19, Ch. "Our Stakeholders’’, Section "Materiality Assessment’’, p.  99, Ch.  "Sustainability Standards and Assurance’’, and Table "Material Aspects and Aspect Boundaries" at http://sustainabilityreport2015.helpe.gr/en/operational-efficiencyperformance/GRI-G4-point/

G4-19

List all the material Aspects identified in the process for defining report content.

 p. 19, Ch. "Our Stakeholders’’, Section "Materiality Assessment’’, p.  99, Ch.  "Sustainability Standards and Assurance’’, and Table "Material Aspects and Aspect Boundaries" at http://sustainabilityreport2015.helpe.gr/en/operational-efficiencyperformance/GRI-G4-point/

G4-20

For each material Aspect, report the Aspect Boundary within the organization

 p.  19 , Ch. "Our Stakeholders’’, Section "Materiality Assessment’’, p.  99, Ch.  "Sustainability Standards and Assurance’’, and Table "Material Aspects and Aspect Boundaries" at http://sustainabilityreport2015.helpe.gr/en/operational-efficiencyperformance/GRI-G4-point/

All Material Aspects presented in this report (Τable "Material Aspects & Aspect Boundaries’’ herein below) apply equally to all of our operations and entities as shown in G4-6.

Moreover, Table "Material Aspects & Aspect Boundaries’’ presents whether the material aspects are material within and/or outside the Group.

G4-21

For each material Aspect, report the Aspect Boundary outside the organization

 p.  19, Ch. "Our Stakeholders’’, Section "Materiality Assessment’’, p. 99, Ch.  "Sustainability Standards and Assurance’’, and Table "Material Aspects and Aspect Boundaries" at http://sustainabilityreport2015.helpe.gr/en/operational-efficiencyperformance/GRI-G4-point/

All Material Aspects presented in this report (Τable "Material Aspects & Aspect Boundaries’’ herein below) apply equally to all of our operations and entities as shown in G4-6.

Moreover, Table "Material Aspects & Aspect Boundaries’’ presents whether the material aspects are material within and/or outside the Group.

G4-22

Report the effect of any restatements of information provided in previous reports, and the reasons for such restatements.

 p.  98, Ch.  "Sustainability Standards and Assurance’’, Section "Methodology’’

No information restatements.

G4-23

Report significant changes from previous reporting periods in the Scope and Aspect Boundaries.

 p.  98, Ch. "Sustainability Standards and Assuranc", Section "Methodology"

No significant changes.

Stakeholder engagement

G4-24

Provide a list of stakeholder groups engaged by the organization.

 p.  17-19,  Ch. "Our Stakeholders’’, Diagrams "Stakeholders Diagram’’ and "Graphical illustration of the Material Aspects -Materiality Matrix,  present the stakeholders involved in the ''Materiality Analysis 2015’’ and interfacing approaches  with stakeholders’ groups.

G4-25

Report the basis for identification and selection of stakeholders with whom to engage.

 p. 17-19, Ch. "Our Stakeholders"

G4-26

Report the organization’s approach to stakeholder engagement, including frequency of engagement by type and by stakeholder group, and an indication of whether any of the engagement was undertaken specifically as part of the report preparation process.

 p. 17-19, Ch. "Our Stakeholders’’, furthermore, the relevant charts of Stakeholders and Materiality Matrix present interfacing approaches with stakeholders’ groups.

These approaches are consistently integrated into the Group's strategy for sustainable development.

Moreover indicative approaches of Group companies are:

ΟΚΤΑ:

With suppliers: Regular communication through personal contacts and discussions are part of the Procurement Department’s operation aiming to enhance cooperation through a constructive dialogue and exchange of information and experience from the existing cooperation.

With customers/fuel stations owners: Scheduled communication through the sales consultants at least once a month, which enable identifying and resolving possible issues, thus maintaining good cooperation. On an annual basis  especially in areas concerning image, safety, products promotion etc., station owners are rewarded.

With employees: Through the ΟΚΤΑ’s web page the employees are daily updated with business news related to the activities of the company and Group. The employees’ approach is mainly through electronic communication. Also, the most important news & announcements are posted on bulletin boards on specific landmarks in all buildings of the company. Once-a-month management meetings are held.

Moreover:

  • Periodical meetings with employees’ representatives.
  • Periodical meetings with relevant authorities (stock exchange etc.)
  • Open and transparent communication with media, publishing regular press releases, interviews and PR articles on internet portals, business magazines, daily newspapers, etc.
  • Online surveys are  conducted in order to understand public  opinion about OKTA.

 

HP CYPRUS:

  1. Written communication to all employees is performed through email and also with posting on notice board.
  2. As per purchasing procedures every year all suppliers/vendors are re-evaluated

 

EKO BULGARIA:

Customers’ communication takes place through qualitative and quantitative surveys (such as Brand Vitality Tracking, loyalty driving assessment).

 

JUGOPETROL:

  • Quarterly reporting to Montenegro Stock exchange
  • Engagement with customers through Loyalty Program
  • Market survey (by GFK, in 2015), focusing on drivers population in Montenegro in general, and on EKO station visitors 

 

EKO SΕRBIA:

  • Press conferences
  • Direct contact with media answering questions about fuels, products and services
  • Organization of discussions with various Focus group
  • Events organization
  • On line, on site and phone customer service 24/7
  • ATL, BTL and other promo activities
G4-27

Report key topics and concerns that have been raised through stakeholder engagement, and how the organization has responded to those key topics and concerns, including through its reporting. Report the stakeholder groups that raised each of the key topics and concerns.

The key topics that stakeholders raised are reflected in the material issues we have chosen to report this year, (see also  G4-19).

 p. 19 , Ch. "Our Stakeholders’’, Diagram "Graphical illustration of the Material Aspects -Materiality Matrix’’

Report Profile

G4-28

Reporting period for information provided.

Calendar year January - December.

 p. 97,  Ch. "Sustainability Standards and Assurance”, Section "Our Approach”

G4-29

Date of most recent previous report.

Posted on Group’s web site in Jul. 2015, concerning the period Jan-Dec 2014.

 p. 97,  Ch. "Sustainability Standards and Assurance", Section "Our Approach"  

G4-30

Reporting cycle.

Annual (01.01 – 31.12)

 p. 97,  Ch. "Sustainability Standards and Assurance", Section "Our Approach"

G4-31

Provide the contact point for questions regarding the report or its contents.

Ms Rania Soulaki, Group CSR Director

E-mail: rsoulaki@helpe.gr

Tel: +30 210 6302894

Fax: +30 210 6302573

 p. 108

GRI Content Index

G4-32

a. Report the ‘in accordance’ option the organization has chosen

b. Report the GRI Content Index for the chosen option

c. Report the reference to the   External Assurance Report

in accordance with the G4 Comprehensive Option 

 p. 101-105, Ch. "Sustainability Standards and Assurance", Section "Report’s Independent Assurance"

Assurance

G4-33

a. Report the organization’s policy and current practice with regard to seeking external assurance for the report.

b. If not included in the assurance report accompanying the sustainability report, report the scope and basis of any external assurance provided.

c. Report the relationship between the organization and the assurance providers.

d. Report whether the highest governance body or senior executives are involved in seeking assurance for the organization’s sustainability report.

This Report was checked and assured - as a whole and every index - from an independent external certification body, prior to its publication.

The certification process involved all Departments / Companies that provided information and senior executives of the Group.

The Report has been signed by the Group’s Chairman of BoD and CEO.

 p. 101-105, Ch. "Sustainability Standards and Assurance", Section "Report’s Independent Assurance"

Governance

G4-34

Report the governance structure of the organization, including committees of the highest governance body.

Identify any committees responsible for decision-making on economic, environmental and social impacts.

http://www.helpe.gr/en/the-group/group-management/

http://www.helpe.gr/en/the-group/group-management/management-structure/

 p. 54-62

 p. 146-149, 152-156

 p.   32-35, Ch. "Corporate Governance and Regulatory Compliance’’

The Executive Committee has responsibilities on sustainable development issues. The other committees are advisory in support of the Board.

G4-35

Report the process for delegating authority for economic, environmental and social topics from the highest governance body to senior executives and other employees.

Τhe management of the Group’s companies reports directly to the Group’s BoD.
GCAD  reports directly to the Group’s CEO.
CFO reports directly to the Group’s CEO and is an executive member of the BoD.
GHSESD reports directly to the Group’s CEO.
The Executive Committee has responsibilities on sustainable development issues.

Meetings with senior management are used to define sustainability issues and reach agreement on prioritising objectives, monitoring activities, and reporting results.
Sustainability is part of how managers and employees do their day-to-day jobs. It is addressed, for example, at regular work discussions and performance reviews. In this way, implementing sustainability is shared across all levels of the Group, from BoD to local level.

The submission of sustainability issues to the Board is made in 2 steps: (a) the  responsible General Director submits a memorandum to the CEO, (b) the CEO recommends to the Board accordingly. The issue is discussed in the relevant Committee, which also makes recommendations to the Board.

G4-36

Report whether the organization has appointed an executive-level position or positions with responsibility for economic, environmental and social topics and whether post holders report directly to the highest governance body.

The managing posts of GCAD and GHSESD are positions with responsibilities on planning, recommendations and implementation.

CFO Director is an executive member of the BoD.

The GCAD reports directly to the Group’s CEO.

The GHSESD reports directly to the Group’s CEO.

G4-37

Report processes for consultation between stakeholders and the highest governance body on economic, environmental and social topics. If consultation is delegated, describe to whom and any feedback processes to the highest governance body.

 p. 36-37, Ch. "Corporate Governance and Regulatory Compliance", Section "Information"

There are many mechanisms that facilitate two-way communication between management and shareholders - employees. Such mechanisms are the General Assembly, employee representatives and representatives of minority shareholders in the Board, the investors & shareholders information office and the unions of employees.

In chapter I’ of the Internal Labor Code, the Committees on Personnel Issues (Hiring Committee, Health & Safety and Industrial Affairs Committee) are defined.

At each facility Committees for Occupational Health and Safety (E.Y.A.E.) are established. Health & Safety Committees have been operating at all Group’s facilities.

All these committees contribute to the exchange of views between employees and management.

 p. 57 (Employee Suggestion Program)

Other Actions:

  • Quarterly meetings of the Group executives (from department head level and above) for presentation, analysis and discussion on the financial and operating results of the Group.
  • Roadshows / participation in conferences (8-10 times per year), quarterly meetings with analysts, meetings with institutional investors, refinery’s field trips with financial analysts & institutional investors, ensure 2-way communication with the investment community.
  • Information meetings - discussions with the engineers of industrial plants.
  • Regular meetings with the elected union representatives.
G4-38

Report the composition of the highest governance body and its committees

  p. 54-62
 

  p. 32, Ch. "Corporate Governance and Regulatory Compliance", Section “BoD”

The statutes of the company provide for a 2 Board Members representing the employees and 2 Board Members representing the minority shareholders.

The breakdown of the BoD members  - of the Group’s companies included in this report – is as follows:

Breakdown of the 84 BoD members, 10 companies, by gender and age group

Gender


 
Age group
<30 30-50 >50
M 0 27 50
F 0 3 4

The percentage of women in senior management positions ranges: HELPE 19.6%, ΕΚΟ 23.8%, HF 15.8%,  ASPROFOS 1.8%, OKTA 16.7%, EKO Bulgaria 25%, Jugopetrol 11%. (no participation in other subsidiaries).

G4-39

Report whether the Chairman of the highest governance body is also an executive officer (and, if so, his or her function within the organization’s management and the reasons for this arrangement).

The Chairman of the Board is executive member of the BoD.

  p. 55

In addition, the role, functions and related responsibilities of the President  are outlined in the Bylaws of the Company, which are approved by the Board, within the frame and in full coherency with the applicable provisions of company law 2190/1920, as amended, apply today.

G4-40

Report the nomination and selection processes for the highest governance body and its committees, and the criteria used for nominating and selecting highest governance body members.

  p. 147, 154-156 

For the 7 members of the Board evaluation as to their performance, supervision and control, is made ​​by the services of the organization they represent (Greek State). 2 Board members elected by employees and 2 members appointed by the Special General Assembly of minority shareholders.

For the not elected and not appointed members of the BoD there is not a documented procedure today but their competences, qualifications and expertise are taken into consideration. The independent Board members selected based on experience and qualifications.

The GA audits and approves the BoD’s performance.

G4-41

Report processes for the highest governance body to ensure conflicts of interest are avoided and managed. Report whether conflicts of interest are disclosed to stakeholders.

  p.  11

  p.  149

  p. 54-55

 p. 38, Ch. "Corporate Governance and Regulatory Compliance’’, Sections “Compliance Services” and “Code of Conduct – Ethics & Transparency”

The current ratio 4 executive and 9 non-executive board members assures  avoidance of ''conflicting interests''.

The BoD subscribed to the principles and best practice provisions of the Hellenic Corporate Governance Council (HCGC), http://www.helex.gr/el/esed

Also, in the Code of Conduct there is specific provision to prevent conflicts of interest, with reference to indicative cases which constitute such a conflict and establishment of an obligatory reference, to the Compliance Office, of financial transactions concerning the spouses or relatives up to second degree of the BoD members.

Moreover indicative'' tools'' to ensure conflicts of interest are avoided and managed are: the Code of Conduct, the list of approved suppliers and their relationship with the officials, and the corporate governance statement.

G4-42

Report the highest governance body’s and senior executives’ roles in the development, approval, and updating of the organization’s purpose, value or mission statements, strategies, policies, and goals related to economic, environmental and social impacts.

ΗELLENIC PETROLEUM aspires to being open and transparent about how we operate, in order to earn and retain the trust and confidence of our customers, employees, shareholders and other important stakeholders. Our reporting and governance structure is an integral part of this commitment.

HELPE’s corporate responsibility performance is dependent on all employees—from Chairman and CEO to staff in each business unit, subsidiary, industrial facility and research laboratory. All of us at HELPE are aware of our corporate responsibilities through the Group’s Code of Conduct, but we also recognize that a central coordinating function is necessary in order to ensure a comprehensive approach to corporate responsibility.

The GCAD coordinates the development, implementation and communication of our global corporate responsibility approach and, with the strategic guidance of the Executive Committee, is responsible for reporting on the Group’s corporate responsibility performance.

To support the Group's strategy, Key Performance  Indicators (KPIs) for sustainable development have been developed and implemented.

The Executive Committee  defines the Group’s Sustainability Policy. The GCAD & GHSESD  recommend the approval of sustainable development issues and are responsible for their implementation.

Definition of sustainability issues, prioritisation of objectives, monitoring of activities and reporting results are discussed in senior management meetings.

In addition to the Executive Committee, other Board Committees oversee issues related to corporate responsibility, such as audit and compliance, executive compensation and risk management, http://www.helpe.gr/en/the-group/group-management/

G4-43

Report the measures taken to develop and enhance the highest governance body’s collective knowledge of economic, environmental and social topics.

  p. 168-171

The risk management system (see and G4-2) provides a platform for sharing knowledge and expertise among the operating companies BoD members in a structured manner, making risk management a key enabler in achieving the strategic objectives.

G4-44

a. Report the processes for evaluation of the highest governance body’s performance with respect to governance of economic, environmental and social topics. Report whether such evaluation is independent or not, and its frequency. Report whether such evaluation is a self-assessment.

b. Report actions taken in response to evaluation of the highest governance body’s performance with respect to governance of economic, environmental and social topics, including, as a minimum, changes in membership and organizational practice

  p.  148

   see also at indicator G4-51, p. 37, Ch. "Corporate Governance and Regulatory Compliance’’, Section “Corporate Governance Performance” 

For the 7 members of the Board evaluation as to their performance, supervision and control, is made ​​by the services of the organization they represent (Greek State). 2 Board members elected by employees and 2 members appointed by the Special General Assembly of minority shareholders.

For the not elected and not appointed members of the BoD there is not a documented procedure today but their competences, qualifications and expertise are taken into consideration. The independent Board members selected based on experience and qualifications.

Apart from the BOD’s evaluation, through the Annual Report, from the Annual General Assembly, the Board monitors and reviews the implementation of its decisions on an annual basis.

Moreover, the introduction of an evaluation system for the members of the BoD and its committees is under consideration, in the context of the aforementioned Code of Corporate Governance of the Hellenic Corporate Governance Council (HCGC), at: http://www.helex.gr/el/esed

G4-45

a. Report the highest governance body’s role in the identification and management of economic, environmental and social impacts, risks, and opportunities. Include the highest governance body’s role in the implementation of due diligence processes.

b. Report whether stakeholder consultation is used to support the highest governance body’s identification and management of economic, environmental and social impacts, risks, and opportunities.

Supporting the BoD the following relevant Committees operate:

  1. Audit Committee (Article 37 Law 3693/2008)
  2. Committee on Finance and Economic Planning, which, among other things, "informed by the CEO, the General Directorate of Finance and auditors about significant risks or exposures and assess the measures taken or to be taken to minimize the risk about ".
  3. Further information about the BoD  Committees at:, http://www.helpe.gr/en/investor-relations/corporate-governance/board-committees/ and http://www.helpe.gr/el/investor-relations/corporate-governance/board-committees/

The drawing up of the Corporate Crisis Management Plan has been completed and approved.

2 members of the Board elected by employees and two members appointed by the Special General Meeting of minority shareholders.

The BoD approves reports & budgets of the Companies and the Group, as well as the 3-month, 6-month and annual reports and announcements of the Group. The   Executive Committee approves reports & budgets of the Divisions and Departments.

G4-46

Report the highest governance body’s role in reviewing the effectiveness of the organization’s risk management processes for economic, environmental and social topics.

  p.  56-57

The BoD approves reports & budgets of the Companies and the Group, as well as the 3-month, 6-month and annual reports and announcements of the Group. The   Executive Committee approves reports & budgets of the Divisions and Departments.

GHSED submits a report on environment, health and safety issues to the BoD at least 2 times a year.

G4-47

Report the frequency of the highest governance body’s review of economic, environmental and social impacts, risks, and opportunities.

The BoD approves reports & budgets of the Companies and the Group, as well as the 3-month, 6-month and annual reports and announcements of the Group. The   Executive Committee approves reports & budgets of the Divisions and Departments.

GHSED submits a report on environment, health and safety issues to the BoD at least 2 times a year.

G4-48

Report the highest committee or position that formally reviews and approves the organization’s sustainability report and ensures that all material Aspects are covered.

The Chairman of the BoD and the CEO approve and sign this Sustainable Development and CSR Report.


The Group CSR Director is authorized to ensure that all material issues are presented with clarity and objectivity.

G4-49

Report the process for communicating critical concerns to the highest governance body.

The Executive Committee  defines the Group’s Sustainability Policy. The GCAD & GHSED  recommend the approval of sustainable development issues and are responsible for their implementation.

 

The GCAD works with business units and functional areas to integrate HELPE’s corporate responsibility principles into business policies, strategies and practices, and brings the voice of external stakeholders into decision-making processes.

The GCAD is accountable for producing an annual corporate responsibility report. To contact members of the Division, please see p. 108.

 

The Corporate Responsibility Report Working Group:

Representatives from business units and functional areas are members of the Corporate Responsibility Report Working Group, in order to promote further integration of corporate responsibility into the business. Individual members have been chosen to be active advocates for corporate responsibility within their respective areas. In addition, the members of the working group, a diverse selection of employees from all divisions of the company, serve as content experts in their respective areas and work with the GCAD to help set goals and develop metrics that support and measure Group’s overall corporate responsibility strategy and objectives.

 

Meetings with senior management are used to define sustainability issues and reach agreement on prioritising objectives, monitoring activities, and reporting results.
The Divisions, as appropriate, inform the CEO on critical issues as soon as they are identified. He, in turn, recommends to the BoD.

Moreover, critical issues communicated through consultation of the BoD with stakeholders (during General Assemblies). See also index G4-37 above.

G4-50

Report the nature and total number of critical concerns, that were communicated to the highest governance body and the mechanism(s) used to address and resolve them.

 The critical issues presented to the Board are the material aspects that were recorded and evaluated through ‘’Materiality Analysis  2015'' (Ch. ‘’Our Stakeholders”, Section “ Materiality Assessment’’, p. 19), the trends and expectations recorded in the internal and external) opinion / satisfaction surveys.

G4-51

Report the remuneration policies for the highest governance body and senior executives.

  p.  148

For the 7 members of the Board evaluation as to their performance, supervision and control, is made ​​by the services of the organization they represent (Greek State). 2 Board members elected by employees and 2 members appointed by the Special General Assembly of minority shareholders. For non-elective and non-appointed members of the Board there is currently no statutory assessment process, but the assignment of tasks is based on ability, qualifications and experience.

For senior and top management, the evaluation is made annually based on KPIs, while the performance of the Company is associated with the objectives of the staff on issues such as sustainable development (safety, environment, etc.). Furthermore, a percentage of the employees’ goals concerns health, safety,  environmental and HR  issues. This  weighting factor varies depending on company / department mission.

DIAXON: BoD members (CEO included) are senior management staff of HELPE and their remuneration is in accordance with the relevant policy of the Group. Senior management is either covered by the relevant HEPLE’s policy or the relevant collective bargaining agreement; which includes bonus connected with achieved goals.

HP Cyprus: the individual goals of executives have a certain percentage related to health, safety and environmental issues.   A policy is in place covering the remuneration of the senior executives for both fixed and variable pay . Variable pay is based on yearly objectives. Τhe executives’ individual goals include financial and operational objectives as well as goals regarding health, safety and improvement / training of personnel.

EKO Serbia
The BoD members receive the compensation prescribed by the General Assembly.
Senior Executives are evaluated through the Performance Management System. In the Performance Contracts and Performance Appraisals of the Company Directors, the company’s performance comprises 100% of the total result of their performance contract.

EKO Bulgaria: the remuneration policy includes fixed pay and variable pay (Performance-based pay & Bonus) and termination payments.

Jugopetrol:  Performance-based pay. BoD members are entitled to a predefined amount of yearly remuneration if the Company has reported a profit in previous year.

G4-52

Report the process for determining remuneration. Report whether remuneration consultants are involved in determining remuneration and whether they are independent of management. Report any other relationships, which the remuneration consultants have with the organization.

  p.  148

No consultants are involved in the process of determining employee compensation.
Remuneration is set based on the Collective Agreement and annual employee evaluation, as agreed between management and unions. To configure remuneration policy the best remuneration practices in the domestic labor market and the most important aspects affecting the competitiveness of remuneration and motivation of executives are taken into account.

At HP Cyprus:

  1. For personnel covered by collective agreement – salary scales (collective agreement ) as per position
  2. For executives – salary surveys studies

EKO Serbia

The salaries are determined via MERCER, comparing to industry averages. Furthermore, when determining remuneration, several additional factors are taken into account: the position of the employee, their previous performance, experience, skills, exceptional merits (successful projects, etc.)

G4-53

Report how stakeholders’ views are sought and taken into account regarding remuneration, including the results of votes on remuneration policies and proposals, if applicable.

Through recommendation, voting and approval by a majority in the General Assembly, for the remuneration and allowances of members of the Board.

Collective bargaining agreements are used to determine the remuneration of the company's employees,  and two social partners, the management and the employees’ unions, play a key role. Usually, before the expiration of the existing Collective Agreement, the Union submits proposals for changes, increases, amendments, etc., and negotiations are following until mutual consensus is reached.

G4-54

Report the ratio of the annual total compensation for the organization’s highest-paid individual in each country of significant operations to the median annual total compensation for all employees (excluding the highest-paid individual) in the same country.

 Countries where there is significant activity are presented in Table “Group’s companies presented in the Report” (Ch. “ Sustainability Standards and Assurance”, Section “Report’s Boundaries”, p. 97)

 

Company/Country Ratio
HELPE                          4.79
ΕΚΟ 3.60
HF 3.46
ASPROFOS                 2.33
DIAXON                      1.86
JUGOPETROL           3.75
ΟΚΤΑ 5.3
ΕΚΟ BULGARIA 5.50
ΕΚΟ SERBIA                4.50
HP CYPRUS 0.05

 

                          

                                

 

 

 

                          

        

 

            

G4-55

Report the ratio of percentage increase in annual total compensation for the organization’s highest-paid individual in each country of significant operations to the median percentage increase in annual total compensation for all employees (excluding the highest-paid individual) in the same country.

  Countries where there is significant activity are shown in Table “Group’s companies presented in the Report” (Ch. "Sustainability Standards and Assurance”, Section “Report’s Boundaries”, p. 97).

 

Company/Country  Ratio   
HELPE                           14.07
ΕΚΟ 4.31
HF 9.29
ASPROFOS 0
DIAXON  -1.84
JUGOPETROL 1.89
ΟΚΤΑ 0
ΕΚΟ BULGARIA         3.5
ΕΚΟ SERBIA                0
HP CYPRUS      

0

 

                          

                                

                  

                  

            

                        

 

 

 

Ethics & Integrity

G4-56

Describe the organization’s values, principles, standards and norms of behavior, such as codes of conduct and codes of ethics

  p. 11-12

  p.  25 (Ch. "Our Vision, Strategy and Objectives”, Section "Vision - Mission – Principles”), p.  35 (Ch. “Corporate Governance and Regulatory Compliance”, Section “Internal Regulatory Framework”), p.  75  (Ch. “Environment, Energy and Climate Change”, Section “Installations Certifications’’)

  Internal Labour Regulation 

The Code of Conduct was approved and notified in 2011 (in Greek and English) with full implementation throughout the Group and its external partners.

The Competition Policy, as to the competition legislation, is in the process of approval by the BoD.

List of procedures for Health, Safety, Quality and Environment - according to international standards - and corresponding policies are available on the corporate network, intranet and internet. These apply across the Group.

Group’s values address all employees at all Group's subsidiaries in Greece and abroad.

The statements, codes or policies concerning procurement activities fall under the existing Purchasing Regulations, paying special attention to cooperation with suppliers.

All of the aforementioned apply across the Group and the relevant continuous training ensures knowledge and application. Deviations from their application have not been detected.

In addition, the companies develop, ad hoc, local policies depending on the nature of activity and the place. For example:

 

At ASPROFOS: policy for the proper use of IT infrastructure

At DIAXON: Policy for Quality, Health & Safety, Internal Labour Regulation, Policy for the proper use of interconnected IT systems.

 

At HP Cyprus:

  • Policy for  box for suggestions / comments / complaints
  • Policy for clean workspace (offices only)
  • Policy  for non intrusive work environment (offices only)
  • Policy  for Casual Friday (offices only)

 

At EKO SERBIA: The company supports the vision “To be customer’s number one choice, offering value for money services and products, caring for our people and respecting the environment”. This vision is inspiring all employees for innovations implementation, network operations, environment friendly projects and CSR activities.

 

Αt ΕΚΟ BULGARIA:

  • Communication Procedure
  • Procedure for Investments / Disposals
  • Internal Labor and Conduct Code
  • Procurement Manual
  • Public and Media Relations
  • Risk Assessment Procedure
G4-57

Report the internal and external mechanisms for seeking advice on ethical and lawful behavior and matters related to organizational integrity, such as help-lines or advice lines.

We are committed to be a responsible Group. This means that we conduct our activities in accordance with relevant ethical, professional, and legal standards. We consider corruption, bribery, and unfair competition to be unacceptable.

Risks related to sustainability such as personnel, safety, environment, business conduct, and supply chain management form an intrinsic part of Group’s  Risk Management. For each of the risk categories within all operating companies as well as on group level an assessment of the risk is done together with determining improvement potential. This improvement potential is input for the execution agendas and on operating and functional level.

In the Code of Conduct, HELLENIC PETROLEUM stipulates that every employee must behave honestly, transparently, and responsibly towards customers, business partners, shareholders, and colleagues. The Code also provides the opportunity for ethical and lawful conduct counselling; as well as for anonymous reports towards the Compliance Office.

G4-58

Report the internal and external mechanisms for reporting concerns about unethical or unlawful behavior and matters related to organizational integrity, such as escalation through line management, whistle-blowing mechanisms or hotlines.

In order to further ensure that our business integrity policy is actively and properly implemented, the Compliance Services operating in the framework of the Code of Conduct. Employees can contact this office with any questions about integrity or reports of alleged wrongdoing. These will be made in the context of confidentiality and discretion.

The Code of Conduct has been translated in all the languages of the countries where the Group operates; it is applicable since 2011.

 p.65 (Section “Round the clock service”)

ΟΚΤΑ:

We have implemented mechanism for protection of the personal data of our clients and employees, as well as our employees’ rights in accordance with the Law.

We have implemented measures and procedures for security of the company assets.

Regular trainings for our new contractors and employees are being performed in reference to  health, safety, environmental issues and internal procedures.

Independent internal audit function is in operation.

Regular trainings for our new contractors and employees are being performed in reference to the health, safety and environmental issues and internal procedures.

 

HP CYPRUS:

The Group’ Code of Conduct has been implemented since  2012. The code handles all aspects and has been communicated to all employees, suppliers and customers and is part of the contracts.

 

EKO BULGARIA:

Reporting mechanisms and the overall reporting responsibility procedures are established by the Group’s Code of Ethics provisions. Obligation for observance of Group’s Code of Conduct is included in each partner’s agreement. Concerns are treated confidentially. The Company has a non-retaliation policy. Cases of concerns have not been raised for the reporting period.

 

EKO SERBIA:

Through listed communication with stakeholders the following topics were raised:

  • Contribution to safety and safe drive
  • Fuels quality, novelty for implementations
  • customer satisfaction improvement
  • loyalty program customer service
  • Management of complaints

 

In cooperation with outsourced agency an open line (email and free of charge phone number) 24/7 is in operation..

Depending on the communication issue , staff in charge is making investigation and preparing final answer.

According to law all forms of communication (concerns, questions, thanks, congratulations or complaints) officially received have to be resolved in 15 days.

For the communication with stakeholders several channels of communication are used: corporate Web site, Loyalty Portal, android application, newsletters,, bulk sms, Memo letters, customer service line, petrol stations employees.

By law all customer complaints recorded should be resolved in 15 days.

DMAs-Management Approach Disclosures on Material Aspects

MATERIAL ASPECTS AND ASPECT BOUNDARIES

Material Aspects Aspect Boundaries Report’s Section GRI Indicator
within outside
 ENVIRONMENT                                                      
 Hazardous Waste x x Environment, Energy and Climate Change

 G4-EN25

 Non Renewable Energy  Sources x x Environment, Energy and Climate Change

 G4-EN3-7

 Renewable Energy Sources x x Environment, Energy and Climate Change

 OG2 & OG3

 CO2 Emissions x x Environment, Energy and Climate Change

 ENVIRONMENT DMA: GHG Emissions

 G4-EN15-19

 SO2 Emissions x x  

 ENVIRONMENT DMA: GHG Emissions

 NOx Emissions x x

Environment, Energy and Climate Change

 ENVIRONMENT DMA: GHG Emissions

 G4-EN15-21

 VOC Emissions x x Environment, Energy and Climate Change

 ENVIRONMENT DMA: GHG Emissions

 G4-EN15-21

 Particulate Matter Emissions x x Environment, Energy and Climate Change  
 Water Consumption x x Environment, Energy and Climate Change

 ENVIRONMENT DMA: Water Consumption

 G4-EN8-10

 Effluent Handling x x Environment, Energy and Climate Change  G4-EN22-23, G$-EN25
 Oil Spills & Leakages x x Environment, Energy and Climate Change

 ENVIRONMENT DMA: Biodiversity

G4-EN24

 Product Impact x x Business Partners & Environment, Energy and Climate Change

 ENVIRONMENT DMA: Product Impact

 G4-EN11-14, EN26, PR1-3

 Environment Protection  Investments x x Environment, Energy and Climate Change  G4-EN31
 SHAREHOLDERS
 Corporate Governance x x Corporate Governance and Regulatory Compliance

 SHAREHOLDERS DMA: Corporate  Governance

 G4-34-55

 Supply Security x x Business Partners  G4-12
 Operational Continuity x x  

 SHAREHOLDERS DMA: Operational  Continuity  

 G4-2

 SUPPLIERS
 Responsible Buying x x Business Partners & Society

 SUPPLIERS DMA: Procurement  Practices

 G4-EC9

 Operational Support x    

 SUPPLIERS DMA: Procurement  Practices

 Supplier Assessment x   Business Partners

 SUPPLIERS DMA: Supplier Assessment

 G4-EN32-33, LA14-15, HR4-6, HR10-11, SO9-10

 EMPLOYEES                                                             
 Job Position Security x x Human Capital

 EMPLOYEES DMA: Job Position Security

 G4-LA1

 Equality & Fairness x   Human Capital  EMPLOYEES DMA: Equality & Fairness
 Occupational Health & Safety x   Human Capital

 EMPLOYEES DMA: Occupational H & S

 G4-LA5-8

 Work Environment x   Human Capital  
 SOCIETY                                                                 
 Community  Engagement &  Partnerships x x Our Stakeholders & Society

 http://sustainabilityreport2015.helpe.gr/userfiles/6ffd2fe2-e2bc-4741-906d-a48900e96f28/symmetoxes%20eng.pdf

 Accident Impact x x Human Capital

 SOCIETY DMA: Accident Impact

 G4-EN11-14, EN26, LA5-7

 Health Screening   x Society

 SOCIETY DMA: Health Screening

ENVIRONMENT

Hazardous Waste/ Effluent HandlingG4-ΕΝ22, G4-ΕΝ23, G4-ΕΝ25

It refers to the collection, transfer, recycling or disposal, managing and monitoring of waste that are either hazardous or non dangerous to both public health and environment. Includes also the disposal of liquid waste and/or effluent into surface waters, which causes water pollution.
The Group's approach is presented in detail in the "Sustainable Development  & Corporate Responsibility Report 2015’’, Chapter "Environment, Energy and Climate Change’’, Section "Air Emissions and Waste".

Use of Renewable Energy Sources, G4-EN3, G4-EN4, G4-EN5, G4-EN6, G4-EN7

It refers to the use of renewable energy sources (RES), such as solar, hydro, geothermal and wind energy.

The Group's approach is presented in detail in the "Sustainable Development  & Corporate Responsibility Report 2015’’, Chapter "’Corporate Identity, Shareholders and Business Activities’’,  Section ''RES’’ and Chapter "Environment, Energy and Climate Change’’, Section ''Biofuels and Renewable Energy Sources".

Further information provided through OG-2 and OG-3 indicators.

Use of Non-Renewable Energy SourcesG4-EN3, G4-EN4, G4-EN5, G4-EN6, G4-EN7

This refers to the use of non-renewable energy sources, such as fossil fuels and electricity consumption from the public power corporation.

Our energy consumption contributes to a significant amount of our costs and is an indicator of the efficiency of our processes. As a large company in an industry sector with relatively high energy consumption, our energy usage has a great impact on society. We have set targets for relative reduction in energy usage; and we monitor and benchmark progress on these targets.

All the Group's refineries are energy optimized and feature cogeneration CHP units, which cover about 37% of the electric energy needs of the Group. Due to the operation of these units the emission of 312 thousand tones of CO2 in 2014 was avoided (based on PPC’s weighted average emission factor of 1.11 kg CO2/kWh for 2013), significantly contributing to the reduction of nation-wide levels of greenhouse gases emissions.

The Group's approach is presented in detail in the "Sustainable Development  & Corporate Responsibility Report 2015’’, Chapter "Environment, Energy and Climate Change’’, Section ''Energy and Climate Change’’. 

GHG Emissions (CO2, SO2 NOx Particulate Matter & VOC emissions)G4-EN15, G4-EN16, G4-EN17, G4-EN18, G4-EN19, G4-EN20, G4-EN21

This refers to the overall GHG emissions (both direct and indirect, mainly CO2) due to Group’s operations.

Τhe Group's strategy is  to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through increased energy efficiency and investments in renewable energy projects.

At all Group’s refineries cogeneration units (Combined Heat and Power or CHP) are in operation; which contribute to the avoidance of a significant proportion of CO2 emissions that would be emitted if the self-produced electricity came from a provider  (such as PPC) with a different fuel mix.

Regarding monitoring and reporting of emissions, the HELLENIC PETROLEUM Group systematically monitors both  the direct CO2 emissions (Scope 1) and the indirect emissions (Scope 2 and 3), to the maximum extent of its activities. Indicatively,  the estimated  CO2 emissions from sea transport of  raw materials and products as well as the estimated carbon footprint (carbon footprint project) of all activities in the Group's office buildings (headquarters and refineries of Aspropyrgos, Elefsina and Thessaloniki) are presented; (certification MyClimate).

The Group's refineries participate in the Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) since its establishment; whereas, since 2013, follow all procedures relevant to monitoring, calculation and verification of emissions; according to the 3rd phase regulations of the EU ETS 2013-2020.

The Group's approach is presented in detail in the "Sustainable Development  & Corporate Responsibility Report 2015’’, Chapter "Environment, Energy and Climate Change’’, Sections ''Air Emissions and Waste’’ and "GHG Emissions’’.

Water ConsumptionG4-ΕΝ8, G4-ΕΝ9, G4-ΕΝ10

This refers to the total amount of water used by the  Group in conducting its operations and activities.
The Group's approach is presented in detail in the "Sustainable Development  & Corporate Responsibility Report 2015’’, Chapter "Environment, Energy and Climate Change’’, Section ''Water Management & Other Resources''.  In the Section’s relevant tables and diagrams the origin of the water used in production processes as well as recycled and reused quantities are presented.

Biodiversity (Oil Spills & Leakages), G4-EN24, G4-EN26, G4-EN27

Refers to oil spills to the environment during the production processes or during transport of the product.

The Group follows a strategy for further development of its activities and the continuation of existing operations with respect to the natural environment.

It is underlined that none of the Group’s industrial complexes is near protected areas (NATURA, RAMSAR). All complexes are at established industrial areas.

The Group has developed protection and enhancement actions of the natural environment and ecosystems as a priority and a fundamental pillar of its sustainable development strategy (see the "Sustainable Development & Corporate Responsibility Report 2015’’, Chapter "Environment, Energy and Climate Change’’, Section "Ecosystems and Biodiversity’’).

HELLENIC PETROLEUM follow closely developments concerning effective implementation of the national strategy for biodiversity while they are at the disposal of  the national authorities  for cooperation in this direction.

Maritime transport fuels are made with modern technology ships inspected regularly by shipping registers in accordance with international standards. The Group’s privately-owned and chartered vessels meet all of the applicable MARPOL regulations and conventions (International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships), EU regulations and ISGOTT & ISM (International Safety Guide for Oil Tankers and Terminals and International Safety Management Code) international standards. The vessels are also covered (by P & I clubs) for pollution incidents. In the   discharging / loading areas there are means of protection and restriction of pollution whereas frequent drills (in collaboration with authorities like the Fire Department, Port Police & Hellenic Police) ensure the readiness of human resources.

In addition, actions such as the training of tanker drivers in defensive driving  minimize risks of road accidents.

Product Impact, G4-PR1 to G4-PR7

Refers to product consumption by the end consumer and its impact on the environment mainly in terms of air emissions.

In the context of our Quality Policy and care for our  customers, the Group is committed to supply products and services which fully comply and / or are better than the agreed specifications, to provide complete technical data on the quality of products/ services to all concerned and to offer its customers, partners and staff the opportunity to evaluate and contribute to the further improvement of the quality of products and services.

Increasingly stringent fuel specifications (zero sulphur fuels), for the fuel supplied to the final consumer, contribute  to the reduction of  gaseous emissions such as sulphur dioxide (SO2) and particulate matters.

Best available techniques, such as the LDAR program, are also applied to the storage and distribution of products in order to reduce VOC emissions. These include: installation of secondary barriers in the floating roof tanks, painting tanks storing volatile products in white (high reflectivity), bottom-loading of tank-trucks and vapour recovery systems at the fuel loading facilities.

Moreover, all of the Group’s installations use vapour recovery systems when loading gasoline, according to the relevant legislation.

EKO’s and HF’s petrol stations are also equipped with vapour recovery systems, used when receiving gasoline from tank-trucks (stage I).

EKO has progressed with the gradual introduction of vapour recovery systems when cars are fuelled with gasoline (stage II) at EKO’s fuel stations (company owned and renovated company controlled stations).

Environmental Protection Investments, G4-EN31

The Group's approach is presented in detail in the "Sustainable Development & Corporate Responsibility Report 2015’’, Chapter "Environment, Energy and Climate Change’’, Section ''Strategy''.

Analytically the 2015  environmental investments are presented in  G4-EN31.

SHAREHOLDERS

Corporate Governance, G4-EN34 to G4-EN55

Refers to the rules, policies, practices and procedures implemented by the Group to determine functions and responsibilities (of management, committees, executives, etc) and the rules and procedures for decision-making and balancing stakeholders’ interests.
The Group's approach is analytically presented in "Sustainable Development & Corporate Responsibility Report 2015", Chapter "Corporate Governance and Regulatory Compliance’’.

Supply Security, G4-12

This refers to oil & gas availability and the potential impact this could have in the long term business model, strategy and operations of the Group.

The crude oil supplies are coordinated centrally by the Group and are covered by frame agreements (term-contracts) and with spot-contracts. The Group procures crude oil primarily from Russia , the Middle East and North Africa. Political instability in the Middle East and North Africa varies the last 50 years and depends on various factors, such as frequent change of governments, military regimes, social disruptions, sanctions from other states or terrorist actions. The political unrest in these areas are able to disrupt the smooth supply of the Group with crude oil. Also, in Russia, possible structural changes in the oil sector, tax and legislative changes, political unrest and problems of transporting crude from Russian terminals can affect crude supply.

The accessibility and flexibility of the Group's refineries to process a wide variety of crude, are key competitive advantages, which are particularly important for both profitability and responsiveness at steep supply reductions of specific crude types, thus ensuring smooth supply of markets where the Group operates.

The Group has adjusted accordingly (see G4-12) the 2015 mixture of oil supplies.

Operational Continuity, G4-2

This refers to planning and establishing procedures which are intended to ensure that critical business functions will either continue to operate in case of serious incidents or disasters or will be recovered to an operational state within a reasonably short period, such as accident plans to ensure continuation of operations.

The activities and results of the Group may be affected by supply disruptions, a variety of external or internal factors (such as military actions in supplying countries), emergency downtime into production units, shutdowns for maintenance etc. The number of Group’s facilities and their geographic dispersion impart considerable flexibility in emergency situations. In addition, the Group has developed considerable expertise and experience of successfully handling logistics crises, such as the events in Libya, the embargo on Iran and shutdowns at different units. In all cases, contingency supply plans were prepared and immediately carried, thus minimizing any operational impact.

SUPPLIERS

Supplier Assessment, G4-12, G4-EN32, G4-EN33, G4-LA14, G4-LA15, G4-HR4-6, G4-HR10, G4-HR11, G4-SO9, G4-SO10

The Group’s Procurement Division. has  primary responsibility for coordinating the evaluation of suppliers (of  materials and services) in accordance with the procedures of the Group and the Procurement Manual.

To develop our supply chain and incorporate our values and principle we seek added value, long term, mutually preferred relationships with partners who can help us to improve  the  total performance and sustainable development of the Group .   In addition, labour practices of our suppliers affect not only our financial performance, but also our relationships with other social partners. For the above reasons, their evaluation is based on business criteria (safety issues, performance, compliance with contractual agreements etc) and also criteria for sustainable development.  Ensuring that Group’s suppliers properly manage issues such as human rights, labour practices and the impact of their activities on society and environment is among the suppliers’ evaluation criteria.

The evaluation of suppliers (and new suppliers)  is complimented ​​by questionnaires which include relevant questions.  No significant findings in 2015.

late 2015 launched the integration of a "suppliers compliance clause’’, into new contracts and purchase orders, regarding adaptation of the principles of the UN Global Compact (in the areas of human rights, labor, environment and anti-corruption).

Procurement Practices (Responsible Buying & Operational Support), G4-EC9, Code of Conduct link: http://www.helpe.gr/uploads/coc_2013_EN/index.html

The Group’s procurement procedures are included in  the Procurement Manual and describe the following points:

  • Who buys:  roles and responsibilities of buyers are documented.
  • Selecting suppliers: continuous training of buyers on  procurement techniques and their application. The introduction and assessment of criteria for selecting suppliers (including sustainable development criteria) takes place in cooperation with relevant Departments
  • Responsible procurement policy: Policy Group is to support local market and local contractors, provided that our criteria for the selection of our partners (such as safety, quality, competitiveness, etc) are not affected. Purchases from local suppliers are  13% at HELPE and DIAXON (industrial facilities) and 97%  at marketing companies  (EKO, EK, EKO BULGARIA, ΟΚΤΑ, HP CYPRUS, EKO SERBIA, JPK MONTENEGRO). For HELPE & DIAXON, as local suppliers are defined those operating in municipalities neighbouring Group’s industrial facilities. For the Group’s trading companies (EKO, HF, EKO BULGARIA, ΟΚΤΑ, HP CYPRUS, EKO SERBIA, JPK MONTENEGRO), as local suppliers are defined those operating within the same country.
  • Transparent relations with suppliers;  The Code of Conduct of the Group covers topics such as conflicts of interest, gifts, working relationship with a supplier, etc.
  • Environmentally friendly procurement:  suppliers evaluation includes  questionnaires which contain criteria concerning their environmental performance.

Interaction with suppliers, ie activities and procedures that  include issues such as compliance with payment terms, purchase order cancellation, support for SMEs, etc, are described in Procurements Manual, Code of Conduct and Internal Labour Regulation. The relevant suppliers’ information is provided with clarity, transparency, respect of competitiveness and equal opportunities.

Noted that among the issues examined by Internal Control was the implementation of the Procurement Manual in commercial, construction and transport contracts and the compliance with the contractual terms. 

EMPLOYEES

Job Position Security, G4-LA1

Refers to the level of security of present and the estimation of future job positions within the Group taking into account the volatile economic situations.

The Group designs and implements strategies and adopt modern policies of Human Resources. In this way it seeks to be "an employer of choice and employees the competitive advantage’’, to achieve the business objectives and confirm the values & principles.

The Group places particular attention in shaping a dynamic policy framework, for the management of human resources, in order to best meet business objectives while meeting the goals and expectations of employees.

The Group's approach is analytically presented in "Sustainable Development & Corporate Responsibility Report 2015", Chapter "Human Capital’’.

Equality & Fairness, G4-EC5

We, at the Group, strive to provide a safe and motivating work environment where our employees are treated with respect and offered equal opportunities for developing their skills and advancing their career. We understand that diversity and inclusion are factors that help us improve business results, enhance our reputation and work with talented people. The relationship with our employees is based on the principle of equal treatment. Both the inclusion and the career path of each employee within the Group, are based on their qualifications, performance and ambitions, without any discrimination.

The Group's approach is analytically presented in "Sustainable Development  & Corporate Responsibility Report 2015", Chapter "Human Capital’’, Sections ''Remuneration and Benefits'', ''Work Environment'' and ''Equal Opportunities - Human Rights''.

Occupational Health & Safety

Refers to utilising policies, practices and initiatives on behalf of the Group, to ensure the health, safety and welfare of employees.

HELLENIC PETROLEUM feels responsible for all people involved in or affected by the activities of the Group. This includes our employees, customers, partners, suppliers, trainees, subcontractors and the general public.

Health and safety performance is a true reflection of operational excellence. Occupational health and safety contributes to the satisfaction of our employees and our reputation.

The continuous care for the health and safety of employees  and the concern for their families as well as the residents of neighbouring municipalities, is a prime consideration for the Group. For this policies, actions and programs have been adopted that contribute to this direction.

The Group's approach is analytically presented in ' Sustainable Development  & Corporate Responsibility Report 2015'. Chapter ‘’The Human Capital’’, Section ''Occupational Health & Safety’’ describes policies and practices used to ensure occupational health and safety. In Section “Education & Training’’  the specific training in health & safety is presented as well as emergency drills held annually in the facilities of HELPE. In Section ‘’Health & Safety Indices’’, the systematically monitored indices  LWIF, AIF, LWIS and PSER (process safety index) are presented as well as the targets set.

The Group’s occupational health & safety services aim to identify, prevent, and ultimately eliminate all work-related occupational diseases or accidents at work.

To further raise awareness of employees in accident prevention and safe plant operation, the implementation of the Rewarding Policy for Safety Performance is continued, among other practices.  In this context, employees’ teams that achieve safety objectives, based on working hours without lost workday accident, are rewarded.

It is our aim to provide a safe, inspiring, and flexible work environment.

Asset integrity and process safety

  • To ensure the reliability of the equipment - as a key element in the safe operation of facilities - several procedures have instituted and implemented by the companies’ staff. These are:
    - Management of Change
    - Safe Design Committees
    - HAZOP studies
  • Equipment inspection  and checks are made periodically ​​by the  Equipment Inspection Departments of the facilities, in accordance with their respective programs.
  • Also, inspections focused on process safety are carried out weekly, by management staff,  in order to identify and correct unsafe behaviours of employees and contractors’ staff.
  • The monthly CCPS bulletin (Beacon), concerning process safety, is distributed to all staff.
  • Procedures, especially in safety issues,  are in place for the prequalification of contractors  and their safety performance assessment after completion of the work.
  • Any unplanned or uncontrolled leakage of substances is measured as process safety event rate, in accordance with the definition and criteria of CONCAWE.

Work Environment

The Group's approach on a safe and satisfying work environment is presented in detail in the "Sustainable Development & Corporate Responsibility Report 2015", Chapter "The Human Capital’’, Sections ''Work Environment'' and ''Harmonization of family and professional life''.

SOCIETY

Community Engagement & Partnerships, G4-EC6, G4-EC7, G4-EC9, G4-SO1, G4-SO2, G4-16

Refers to the policies and practices of the Group for the understanding of the impact on local communities and the creation of partnerships with stakeholders.

The Group's approach, towards the local communities, is presented analytically in the ' Sustainable Development  & Corporate  Responsibility Report 2015', Chapter ‘’Society’’.

For partnerships see at: http://sustainabilityreport2015.helpe.gr/userfiles/6ffd2fe2-e2bc-4741-906d-a48900e96f28/symmetoxes%20eng.pdf

Accident Impact

This refers to actions or practices for early detecting the impact of potential accidents (e.g. explosions) near communities, which is key to encounter them successfully.

Impact assessment is carried out in accordance with the requirements of European and Greek legislation Seveso, and reported to the authorities as a safety assessment. Based on this assessment, contingency plans for the protection of local residents and employees are implemented.

Techniques and measures, above and beyond those that are imposed by the regulations and legislation, are implemented at all  Group’s facilities, in order to ensure for Occupational Health and Safety.

In this context, a study to analyze operational risks (HAZOP or Hazard & Operability Study) is a prerequisite for any new facility or for the extensive modifications of existing units. The operation and maintenance of the facilities rely on well-trained and experienced personnel that comply with safe operating procedures.

Particularly important for the prevention and addressing of accidents are:

  1. Issuing of work permits for all maintenance works at production facilities
  2. Safety training and successful exams are prerequisite for the personnel of  contractors performing maintenance works.
  3. Managing changes safely.
  4. Scheduled training of employees, in theory and practice, in order to be able to respond at an emergency (power failure, loss of utilities, steam, air, etc.).
  5. Reporting and investigating accidents. All accidents or near misses are reported and investigated in order to plan corrective actions to prevent their reoccurrence. Accidents that are monitored include personal injury - including first aid - explosions, spills, property damage, road accidents etc. All events are statistically analyzed in order to improve safety.
  6. Planned drills for different types of accidents, often in collaboration with relevant bodies such as General Secretariat for Civil Protection, Fire Brigade, Police etc.

Health Screening

This refers to actions or practices for early detecting potential health issues problems in communities, such as proactive monitoring of residence around facilities, which is key to encounter them successfully.

this context, the Group sponsors programs providing primary care services (in collaboration with bodies such as MDM and local authorities), particularly in communities neighbouring industrial facilities.
, in collaboration with Diagnostic Centre,  preventive medical examinations to   students of the first Lyceum of Aspropyrgos, who participated in school volleyball and basketball games, took place. While at the "Thriasio" General Hospital of Elefsina, the Group covered expenses concerning reagents purchase for the Hematology Laboratory, floor standing refrigerated centrifuge blood collection devices, other consumables and fuel for ambulances.

Economic Indicators

G4-EC1

Direct economic value generated and distributed.

   p. 48

In 2015, the Group’s turnover was €7,303 million (2014: €9,478 million) and the social product amounted to €1.4bn (2014: € 1,8bn) distributed as follows:

  • €181m to staff (salaries and social benefits)
  • €70m directly to the Greek State through direct taxes and insurance contributions, as well as
  • €1.1bn of indirect taxes (excise duty, VAT) collected and delivered to the Greek State
  • €3.2m to society through Corporate Social Responsibility initiatives.
  • €433 m reserves

Employees’ remuneration and benefits

Group’s payroll  € 160,194,173

Payroll taxes € 33,716,097

Insurance contribution € 35,429,091

Employees’ insurance plan € 4,808,707

Employees’ pension plan  € 1,906,599

Staff commuting  € 3,686,582

School allowance € 295,304

Employees’ university studies allowance € 162,171

Support to employees’ family members with special needs € 60,092

Wedding/birth/death allowance €79,435

Crèche allowance € 461,024

Employees’ children camping € 188,062

Awards to top students  € 275,494

Other benefits € 827,525

Vouchers / gifts on Easter & Christmas € 1,514,261

G4- EC2

Financial implications and other risks and opportunities for the organization’s activities due to climate change.

  p. 82, Ch. “Environment, Energy and Climate Change”, Section “Energy and Climate Change”

The potential risks and related financial-economic impacts are an integral part of the feasibility report for each project and investment from both the response side (mitigation of) the phenomenon of climate change and in terms of the adaptation strategy to climate change impacts (eg. in case of natural variations, estimated as significant for installations near the coastal front of Greece).

The participation in committees & actions with other companies in the sector (see link http://sustainabilityreport2015.helpe.gr/userfiles/6ffd2fe2-e2bc-4741-906d-a48900e96f28/symmetoxes%20eng.pdf) facilitates the monitoring of the forthcoming regulatory changes.
The Group’s commitment to sustainability issues is confirmed by the Group’s commitment to the UNGC and the signing of  the Charter for Sustainable Development (Sustainable Greece 2020 initiative).
Financial impacts as well as other possible risks and opportunities for corporate activities related to climate change are included in any feasibility study for future investments.

The company’s strategic choice for tackling climate change is the energy saving, both in production activity and administrative functions.
The obvious financial impacts have to do with the costs associated with the projected deficit of the rights concerning emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG), as the three refineries in Greece participate in the European Emissions GHG Trading Scheme. The developments concerning the relevant Directive 2003/87/EC are monitored, at European level for the sector (participation in FuelsEurope) and the impacts are evaluated at country and company level.

For the period 2013-2020 (third trading phase), during which the rules of rights allocation are changing  and only 50% of total allowances will be free distributed  while the remaining 50%  is auctioned - because of the exposure of the refining industry at the significant risk of  ‘’carbon leakage’’ - the refineries will receive 100% free allocation of allowances to be derived on the basis of the price benchmark resulting from the average of the 10% most efficient installations of the oil sector (in the years 2007-2008), which is 29.5 kg CO2/CWT. This leads the industry benchmark at European level reductions of 23%, a higher percentage than the EU target of 21% applicable to other industry sectors.

HELLENIC PETROLEUM, for the period 2013-2020 have an additional burden as a consequence of the European Community's decision, based on which was subsequently necessary to implement a cross-sectoral correction factor ( CSCF), which resulted in a significant increase in the rights deficit (about 30%) and consequently the associated operating costs. It is noted that the implementation of HELPE’s main strategy for increasing energy efficiency has already contributed to a reduction of the deficit, while it is estimated that on average it will be around 25% (estimated annual compliance costs 7-14 m €, depending on the price of emission allowances - EUAs).

Additionally, based on recent decisions of the EU on the implementation of a mechanism for Market Stability Reserve and the expected structural restructuring of the ETS, a significant increase of the rights price (€ / ton) is expected; which will directly affect the cost of compliance.
Given that the technical options available for effective reduction of CO2 emissions are limited at existing facilities; because refineries have a high degree of energy optimization by implementing for many years energy saving projects, there will be costs to purchase the required emission allowances from 2013.
It is also noted that because power generation activities are not allocated free allowances (since 2013), refineries  incur additional increased cost concerning electricity purchases; as the cost of buying allowances for electricity is partially passed on to consumers.
Other potential risks include increased costs for fuel and raw materials, reduced demand for energy-intensive products as well as additional measures to control and reduce GHG, which are related for the sector at European level.

The evaluation of potential opportunities for natural gas & advanced biofuels is continuous. Moreover, investments are implemented for the improvement of the energy efficiency and in the field of RES.

G4- EC3

Coverage of the organization’s defined benefit plan obligations.

The Group does not use defined benefit plan, but defined contribution plan.

The obligations of the company are covered by the company's general resources. For total expenses see G4-EC1.

The pension and medical insurance plans cover the following proportion of employees:

% of employees participating in:
Company Company’s pension plan Company’s medical insurance plan
HELPE 95.76 100
EKO 98.15 100
HF 86.96 100
DIAXON 95.83 98.96
ASPROFOS 64.24 100
HP CYPRUS 89.09 98.18
EKO BULGARIA 0 100

The employees participate in meeting the cost, and more specifically the health and pension plan.

Indicative examples are following:

DIAXON, HELPE, ΕΚΟ, ΗF:

Employee insured after 1993: employer contribution 0.5%, employee contribution  0.5%-5%.  Employee insured before 1993: employer contribution 2.5 or 6.5%, employee contribution  1.5%- 5%.

ΑSPROFOS: employee contribution: 2-3%, employer contribution: 1.5%

HP CYPRUS: participation 100%. Α scheme closed for new members in 2015 defines: Define Benefit Plan 17,3% Employer, Define Contribution 5% Employer & Define Contributions 5%-15% Employee. A new scheme for newcomers as from 2015 defines: Define Contribution 8% Employer & Define Contributions 5%-15% Employee.
The obligations of this scheme is expected to be covered by the assets by 76%.

JUGOPETROL: 15% employee / 5.5% employer contribution. Retirement contributions are legal obligations, set up by State laws and regulations.

ΕΚΟ SERBIA: contribution to pension & health are in accordance with the law 11% of gross earnings

G4- EC4

Financial assistance received from government.

No direct financial support from the State.

G4- EC5

Ratios of standard entry level wage by gender compared to local minimum wage at significant locations of operation.

With the assumption that "local minimum" are the national collective bargaining agreements, then, HELPE’s employees are compensated over and above them; without any discrimination or differentiation.
No permanent employee is remunerated at the minimum / basic salary in HELPE, EKO, DIAXON, EKO BULGARIA, EKO SERBIA and JUGOPETROL.

The typical average employee’s wage in the Group is significantly higher than the equivalent salary in Greece; respectively abroad is up to 300% higher than the corresponding national average.

Significant locations of HELPE’s operations are the industrial sites Aspropyrgos, Elefsina & Thessaloniki.

Indicative examples of salaries are:

ΕΚΟ BULGARIA:  local minimum € 215, newcomer’s  salary €500.

ΕΚΟ SERBIA: newcomers  get salary higher than the local minimum.

JUGOPETROL: the lower company’s salary is 2.28-2.65 times higher than the local minimum.

ΟΚΤΑ: the lower company’s salary is 2.4-3.8 times higher than the local minimum.

ΗΡ CYPRUS: There is a collective bargaining agreement, which regulates the wage scale in relation to the respective job. On the basis of these standards the payroll of newcomers is adjusted.  The permanent staff is paid based on levels of collective agreement. The seasonal staff is paid based on the minimum wage (€900 per month) fixed by law for specific occupations.

G4- EC6

Proportion of senior management hired from the local community at significant locations of operation.

Staff with rank higher that of the Assistant Director are included in the category of senior management.

The proportion, of this staff, from local communities varies from 33% to 100% (see following table).
Moreover, HELPE, in the process of recruiting staff, allocates additional merit to residents of the neighboring to the refineries municipalities (definition of significant locations of operation).

 

HELPE, HF, ΕΚΟ: 100%

ASPROFOS: 100%

DIAXON: 33.3%

ΕΚΟ BULGARIA: 50 %

ΕΚΟ SERBIA: 67%

HP CYPRUS: 100 %

JUGOPETROL: 77.78%

ΟΚΤΑ: 33.33%

G4- EC7

Development and impact of infrastructure investments and services supported.

  p. 89-95, Ch. “Society”

A 2nd survey on Materiality Analysis & Stakeholders engagement  was conducted in 2015 (see "Corporate Sustainable Development & C.S. Responsibility Report 2015’’, Chapter "Our Stakeholders", Section "Materiality Analysis’’) and a Qualitative & Quantitative Survey (Company Reputation Monitor), in local communities, took place in 2014.

Such approaches are used to determine investments in infrastructure and other activities for the benefit of local communities. All projects are made in consultation with local communities. Indicative examples are:

  • Donation of  bitumen (€ 22,173) for road construction projects in the Municipality of Elefsina.
  • Support the operation of municipal libraries - in local communities - by equipping them with modern equipment, while creating updated databases and enhancing their functionality. In parallel with the voluntary participation of employees of the Group, we enrich the libraries’ content and increase the educational opportunities of the public offering books.
  • Deforestation works at Elefsina Municipality (€ 8,460).
  • Fuel donation for surveillance and fire protection needs to the Region of C. Makedonia (€ 5,000).
  • Fuel subsidy to 3 voluntary organizations for surveillance and fire protection needs of the Municipalities of Megara & Thessaloniki (€ 6,000).
  • Anti-mosquito program at Municipality Ampelokipi -  Menemeni (€ 5,000).
  • Repair of vessel of Elefsina Port Authority.
  • Fuel subsidy for the Municipality’s  first aid vehicles (€ 10,000)
  • Donation of Tarek Atoui’s  sound equipment at  the Old Olive Mill of Elefsina (€ 2,981.52)
  • Donation of EKO fuel prepaid cards to the Region of W. Attica for firefighting at Aspropyrgos (€ 6.000).
  • "Thriasio" General Hospital of Elefsina: Donation of floor standing refrigerated centrifuge acting blood collection devices and other materials. Donation of EKO fuel prepaid card for ambulances (€ 45,285.12).
  • Donation of refuse truck to the municipality of Megara (€ 50,000).
  • Purchase of folding baby cots for the Kindergartens of the Primary Education of Municipality of Evosmos - Kordelio (€ 1,230).
  • Free medical consultations for 7 NGOs at the Oncology Clinic of Theageneio (€ 1,000).
  • Construction of playground at  Municipality of Ampelokipi Menemeni (€ 55,350).
  • Purchase of personal protective equipment to upgrade the operational activities of the 2nd Fire Department in Thessaloniki (€ 2,584.23).
  • Steel purchase for the foundations of prefabricated classrooms for the Schools at Kordelio-Evosmos (€ 1,500).
  • Donation of baby cots to the 2nd and 24th Kindergartens of Evosmos (€ 1,069.98).
  • Donation of oil barrels for the vehicles  maintenance of Delta Municipal.
  • Maintenance subsidy of the vessels of Thessaloniki  Port Authority (€ 2,186.95).
  • OKTA’s significant infrastructural investments conducted in 2015 were:
    - Donation of used firefighting vehicle and equipment to the Municipality of Ilinden and the  Firefighting Unit of Kumanovo.
    - Donation of used personal computers to the Elementary school "Marko Cepenkov", v.Vrazale, the Protection and Rescue Directorate and the NGO GoGreen.
    - The new steam boilers with five time lower capacity were put in operation. This investment contributes in spending less fuel oil and consequently reduced air emissions.
  • EKO Bulgaria: playground donated to a kindergarden in Yambol € 2,700
G4- EC8

Significant indirect economic impacts, including the extent of impacts.

The financial crisis has escalated expectations for multinational enterprises to create more social value, beyond compliance with regulations and philanthropy. Corporate responsibility has emerged as an important element of the private sector’s response to these expectations and demands.

For additional information about our contribution to society,  please see ‘’Sustainable Development & Corporate Responsibility Report 2015’’, Chapter “Society”.

  1. Economic development in areas of high poverty: see indicator EC7 for relevant projects. Furthermore, JPK invests its funds in Montenegro and thus it helps the country boost its economic output and indirectly create new jobs. Capex of more than 20 million is expected in the next five years.
  2. Economic impact of improving or deteriorating social or environmental conditions: see "Sustainable Development & Corporate Responsibility Report 2015’’, Chapter  “Environment, Energy & Climate Change” for actions aiming at improving environmental conditions.
  3. Availability of products and services for those on low incomes: see "Sustainable Development & Corporate Responsibility Report 2015’’, Chapter “Society” for fuel donations, donation of food vouchers  and donation of fuel prepaid cards.
  4. Enhancing skills and knowledge amongst a professional community or in a geographical region:
    Α modern skills development program was implemented at Elefsina, in collaboration with Athens University of Economics. The program offered an opportunity for young people from Thriasio to learn and "draw" valuable knowledge in areas such as Digital Marketing, Innovation and Digital Entrepreneurship and Social Entrepreneurship. A common finding is the need of young people to get answers to critical questions, through access to modern ways of thinking and information in order to acquire the right skills, enrich their CV and claim a place in the highly competitive work environment. The program, which was available at no charge, provided a certificate of attendance.
    At HP CYPRUS, training of university students takes place at the terminal or Head Office.
  5. Jobs supported in the supply chain or distribution chain:  see "Sustainable Development & Corporate Responsibility Report 2015’’, Chapter “Society”, Tables ‘’Responsible buying from local suppliers’’.
    JPK relocated its Headquarters (12/2014) from Kotor to Podgorica. This obviously impacted Kotor municipality, as it lost its main employer.
    At OKTA:
    - We continue with road transportation, thereby supporting truck transportation sector.
    - We outsourced product quality checking
    - For the complete reconstruction of the energy efficient administrative building, local construction companies and suppliers were engaged.
  6. Economic impact of change in location of operations or activities:
    In the process of staff recruitment, at HELPE, there a procedure in favour of the permanent residents of the municipalities  neighbouring to our refineries.
  7. Significance of the impacts in the context of  stakeholder priorities, such as national and international standards, protocols, and policy agendas:
    A 2nd survey on Materiality Analysis & Stakeholders engagement  was conducted in 2015 (see "Sustainable Development & Corporate Responsibility Report 2015’’, Chapter "Our Stakeholders”, Section "Materiality Analysis’’) and a Qualitative & Quantitative Survey (Company Reputation Monitor), in local communities, took place in 2014.
    Such surveys, regular communication and consultation are used to determine the investment in infrastructure and other actions for the benefit of local communities and to understand the significant indirect effects locally. Assessing the findings  resulted  in relevant activities  planning. It has been recorded that local communities anticipate actions with a focus on supporting the unemployed, health services, in support of elderly and vulnerable groups in general. Moreover, during the planning phase of new investment care is taken of the direct and indirect impacts.
G4- EC9

Proportion of spending on local suppliers at significant locations of operation.

  p. 93  (Ch. "Society’’, Tables "Buying Locally”)

The spending proportion on locally-based suppliers at significant locations of operation is   13% for HELPE and DIAXON (industrial facilities)  and  97% for the Group’s marketing companies (EKO, HF, EKO BULGARIA, ΟΚΤΑ, HP CYPRUS, EKO SERBIA, JUGOPETROL) and is presented in detail in "Sustainable Development & Corporate Responsibility Report 2015’’, Chapter "Society”.

As local suppliers, for HELPE and DIAXON, are defined those based in municipalities adjacent to industrial facilities of the Group. For the marketing companies of the Group  (EKO, HF, EKO BULGARIA, ΟΚΤΑ, HP CYPRUS, EKO SERBIA, JUGOPETROL) as local suppliers are defined those based in the same country.

As significant locations are defined the municipalities neighbouring  to the Group’s refineries and DIAXON’s  industrial complex.

Group policy is to support the local market and local contractors, always in accordance with  suppliers’ selection criteria, such as safety, quality standards, competitiveness etc. In this context the Group (along with other large companies) is investing in proper training of subcontractors to ensure their ability to participate in  Group’s projects.

Environmental Indicators

G4-EN1

Materials used by weight or volume

Environmental Indicators per Facility BEA BEE1 BEΘ

SUBSIDIARIES
(OKTA=A, EKO=B, HF=C, DIAXON=D, HPC=Ε, EKO SERBIA=Ζ, EKO BULGARIA=H, JUGOPETROL=G)

Units Comments
Crude oil 5,271.3 4,444.4 2,891.3 N/A ktn -
Throughput (crude oil & other feeds processed) 7,135.2 5,910.0 4,209.8 N/A ktn
Total Distribution 8,343.5 6,191.7 4,320.2 2,653.2 ktn
Catalysts 2,102 147 - - tn
Lubricants 21 9 352 55 tn
Additives & other materials 2,120 151 2,503 51,532/10,242 tn
Solvents - - - 1.2 tn
Packaging materials - - - 2,780 tn
Materials used at hydraulic fracturing,
(such as hydraulic fluids, anticorrosive agents, acids, surfactants, scale inhibitors, gelling agents,
friction reducers, etc.)
N/A N/A N/A N/A tn
Total of non renewable materials 8,347.8 6,192.0 4,322.7 2,717.8 ktn
Renewable materials (biodiesel) 67,503 - 45,177 N/A* m3

1 It includes Megara facility
2 Estimation

G4-EN2

Materials used that are recycled input materials

Environmental Indicators per Facility BEA BEE ΒΕΘ

SUBSIDIARIES
(OKTA=A, EKO=B, HF=C, DIAXON=D, HPC=Ε, EKO SERBIA=Ζ, EKO BULGARIA=H, JUGOPETROL=G)

Units Comments
Slop oil/ throughput - 1.4 0.19 1.0 (B)
7.7 (D)
%  

 

G4-EN3

Energy consumption within the Group

Environmental Indicators per Facility BEA BEE BEΘ

SUBSIDIARIES
(OKTA=A, EKO=B, HF=C, DIAXON=D, HPC=Ε, EKO SERBIA=Ζ, EKO BULGARIA=H, JUGOPETROL=G)

Units Comments
Energy from non-renewable fossil fuels 18,615,234 12,890,514 5,837,772 128,229 GJ

The purchased electricity derived from the suppliers’ invoices; while the self-produced electricity is measured by power meters on site.

The source for the calorific value of the fuel is the National Inventory Report 2015.

Electricity, energy for heating, cooling and steam are not available for sale; neither is self-produced energy for heating, cooling and steam.

ΒΕΑ, ΒΕΕ & ΒΕΘ: Fuel consumption comes from direct measurements.

ΒΕΕ & ΒΕΘ: Heating and steam consumption is calculated.

Consumed energy from renewable fuels 0 0 0 3.9
(B & C)
Consumed electricity from non renwable sources (from external provider) 496,083 1,025,675 646,849 230,238
Consumed electricity from renwable sources (from external provider) 113,356 234,368 147,806 27,202
Self-generated electricity 978,757 397,486 4,284 0
Total electricity consumption 1,588,196 1,657,528 798,939 257,440
Heating consumption 13,737,971 7,398 - 104,639
Cooling consumption - - - 326
Steam consumption 2,330,615 5,244 1,745,717 3,547
Total energy consumption within the Group 19,224,673 14,102,766 6,632,427 385,673

 

G4-EN4

Energy consumption outside of Group

Environmental Indicators per Facility BEA BEE BEΘ SUBSIDIARIES
(OKTA=A, EKO=B, HF=C, DIAXON=D, HPC=Ε, EKO SERBIA=Ζ, EKO BULGARIA=H, JUGOPETROL=G)
Units Comments
Transportation and distribution (Upstream) 3,782.25 63.2 TJ

The calculations were based on data from Carbon Footprint 2015. The source for the calorific value of fuels is the National Inventory Report 2015. The Business travel (Upstream) is considered to be 30% of the total. “Transportation and distribution” was calculated from sea transport. The emission factors are from Second IMO GHG Study 2009.

For the “employee commuting” the average calorific value of petrol and diesel was used.

Business travel (Upstream) 1.74 4.1
Employee commuting (Upstream) 11.29 4.7
Total Upstream 3,795 72.0
Downstream (transportation and distribution) 2,165 68.0

 

G4-EN5

Energy Intensity

BEA BEE ΒΕΘ SUBSIDIARIES
(OKTA=A, EKO=B, HF=C, DIAXON=D, HPC=Ε, EKO SERBIA=Ζ, EKO BULGARIA=H, JUGOPETROL=G)
Units Comments
2.30 2.28 1.54 0.15 GJ/tn total distribution Energy in Giga Joule per ton of total distribution. The index concerns total energy consumed within the organization.

 

G4-EN6

Reduction of energy consumption

Environmental Indicators per Facility BEA BEE ΒΕΘ SUBSIDIARIES
(OKTA=A, EKO=B, HF=C, DIAXON=D, HPC=Ε, EKO SERBIA=Ζ, EKO BULGARIA=H, JUGOPETROL=G)
Units Comments
Reduction of energy consumption in 2015 (Fuel) 491,283 1,735,220 0 40,523
(A, B)
GJ

The saving is calculated in relation to the previous year. ΒΕΑ, BEE: calculation. ΟΚΤΑ, ΕΚΟ-ΕΚ, HPC: estimation. All improvements were done during SD. Steam savings are included expressed as fuel equivalent.

No energy savings concerning electricity, heating and cooling. 

Reduction of energy consumption in 2015 (Electricity) 0 0 0 5,083
(A, C, E)
Total reduction of energy consumption in 2015  491,283 1,735,220 0 45,605

 

G4-EN7

Reductions in energy requirements of products and servisces

The end products (fuels) of the commercial companies HF and EKO contribute significantly to lower emissions and reduced fuel consumption. EKO’s petrol ‘95 Ekonomy’ assures fuel economy of up to 2% and EKO’s diesel Ekonomy assures up to 4% less fuel consumption. Moreover, gasoline ‘EKO Racing 100’ reduces emissions, cleans and protects the engine and the fuel circuit, and significantly reduces friction, achieving up to 4% higher motor efficiency. Also, the new EKO’s fuel Diesel Avio assures zero engine power loss throughout the engine’s operation and over the whole range of engine’s revs (according to the motor test CEC F-98-08, which is standard for the modern common rail diesel engines) as well as fuel economy, ranging from 0.17 to 3.84% depending on the engine type and / or capacity. Additionally, the use of BP’s gasoline Ultimate 95 provides, on average, 12 extra kilometers per filling as compared to conventional fuel; while BP’s Ultimate Diesel assures, on average, 42 extra kilometers per filling as compared to conventional fuel. Finally, the improved BP’s heating oil ‘BP Super Heat’ has unique characteristics that contribute to environmental protection. More information on standards, assumptions and calculation methodologies are available at the official site of the marketing companies EKO and HF, at http://www.eko.gr & http://www.hellenicfuels.gr.

G4-EN8

Total water withdrawal by source

Environmental Indicators per Facility BEA BEE BEΘ SUBSIDIARIES
(OKTA=A, EKO=B, HF=C, DIAXON=D, HPC=Ε, EKO SERBIA=Ζ, EKO BULGARIA=H, JUGOPETROL=G)
Units Comments
Total 5,228,206 9,659,560 1,929,527 1,399,821 m3

The water consumption is calculated based on the figures of the water company’s invoices (except for BΕΘ, that comes from relevant meters); and surface and ground water consumption is taken from records of relevant meters or is estimated.
Estimated consumption is also the case if a subsidiary has no water consumption meters.
The Group does not consume water from wastewater of other organizations or other sources.

Water utility 4,071,093 4,894,131 1,929,527 1,351,099
Surface water (Sea water) 1,157,113 3,879,424 0 2,965
Ground water (Drilling) 0 886,005 0 45,737
Rainwater 0 0 0 20
(E)

 

G4-EN9

Water sources significantly affected by withdrawal of water

There are no significantly affected water sources.

G4-EN10

Water recycled and reused

Environmental Indicators per Facility BEA BEE ΒΕΘ SUBSIDIARIES
(OKTA=A, EKO=B, HF=C, DIAXON=D, HPC=Ε, EKO SERBIA=Ζ, EKO BULGARIA=H, JUGOPETROL=G)
Units Comments
Percentage 10.25 25.47 5.89 N/A* % Figures either directly from gauges or by estimation (eg. for BEA is estimated that 10% of the water from the wastewater treatment unit is utilized for internal operations - cleaning, hydraulic tests, etc.).
Volume 535,989 2,459,850 113,731 388
(B & E)
m3

 

G4-EN11

Operational sites owned, leased, managed in, or adjacent to, protected areas and areas of high biodiversity value outside protected areas

None of the Group’s refineries is near protected areas (NATURA, RAMSAR). All installations are located in established industrial areas.

G4-EN12

Description of significant impacts of activities, products, and services on biodiversity in protected areas and areas of high biodiversity value outside protected areas

Significant work has been done for the minimization of the impacts to the environment and the ecosystem. The refineries, in Greece, are the industrial sector with the wider application of the Best Available Techniques for the environmental protection. The management of liquid and solid waste is based on BATs resulting in zero impact on living organisms while air emissions are controlled based on the Guidelines for air quality and therefore the effect on living organisms is estimated to be negligible.

G4-EN13

Habitats protected or restored

There are no such habitats. See also G4-EN11.

G4-EN14

Total number of IUCN Red List species and national conservation list species with habitats in areas affected by operations, by level of extinction risk

BEA BEE BEΘ SUBSIDIARIES
(OKTA=A, EKO=B, HF=C, DIAXON=D, HPC=Ε, EKO SERBIA=Ζ, EKO BULGARIA=H, JUGOPETROL=G)
Units Comments
0 0 0 0 - -

 

G4-EN15

Direct GHG emissions, Scope 1. (EU ETS integration year: 2005). See EN17 for indirect emissions due to personnel commuting and product transport.

Environmental Indicators per Facility BEA BEE ΒΕΘ SUBSIDIARIES
(OKTA=A, EKO=B, HF=C, DIAXON=D, HPC=Ε, EKO SERBIA=Ζ, EKO BULGARIA=H, JUGOPETROL=G)
Units Comments
Verified CO2 emissions  (for the 3 domestic refineries participating in EU ETS) 1,205,859 1,794,883 301,079 8,808
(A, B, C, D)
tn CO2 eq

Third party emissions verification according to EU Regulations 600 & 601/2012.

Direct GHG emissions besides  CO2. Emissions of HCFCs, CH4, N2O.

4,823 2,650 819 - Calculation based on GWP from EU Regulation 517/2014.
Total 1,210,682 1,797,532 301,898 8,808

There are no emissions of biogenic CO2.

Emissions are monitored since 2005 under EU ETS (Phase 1: 2005-2008, Phase 2: 2008-2012, Phase 3: 2013-2020).

As base year is chosen the first year of the current period, i.e. 2013 (base year emissions = 3,461,438 tnCO2). Consolidated approach to reporting of emissions based on operational control.

 

G4-EN16

Indirect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Scope 2)

Environmental Indicators per Facility BEA BEE BEΘ SUBSIDIARIES
(OKTA=A, EKO=B, HF=C, DIAXON=D, HPC=Ε, EKO SERBIA=Ζ, EKO BULGARIA=H, JUGOPETROL=G)
Units Comments
Electricity consumption at facilities 189,618 392,045 247,246 64,849 tn CO2 eq

Only CO2 emissions are included. Emissions were calculated using electricity consumption and CO2 emissions factors.

PPC’s EF for 2014 is 1,12 kg CO2/kWh

Elpedison’s EF for 2015: 0,389 kg CO2/kWh

ΙΕΑ: BULGARIA  EF 2009-2011: 0,558 kg CO2/kWh 

MONTENEGRO EF 2009-2011: 0,454 kg CO2/kWh

SERBIA 2009-2011: 0,745 kg CO2/kWh.

ΟΚΤΑ: calculation based on UNDP’s data (0,83785 kg CO2/kWh). CYPRUS EF from “Mayors’ Covenant”. Base year is 2014 when the 5 main buildings of the Group were included. The detailed calculations are included in Carbon Footprint 2015. The total indirect emissions of the base year were calculated as 857,124 tn CO2 eq. Consolidated approach to reporting of emissions based on operational control.

Electricity consumption at HQs offices

HQ’s office buildings (at Chimaras str & Gravias str, Marousi): 1,825 tn CO2 eq.

The sum of indirect emissions (Scope 2) for the Group is 895,683 tn CO2 eq.

 

G4-EN17

Other indirect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Scope 3)

Environmental Indicators per Facility BEA BEE ΒΕΘ SUBSIDIARIES
(OKTA=A, EKO=B, HF=C, DIAXON=D, HPC=Ε, EKO SERBIA=Ζ, EKO BULGARIA=H, JUGOPETROL=G)
Units Comments
Total amount of indirect CO2 emissions, from all activities (air trips, private transportation, paper consumption) at the administration buildings (HQs, Aspropyrgos, Elefsina & Thessaloniki) 2,606 tn CO2 eq Only CO2 emissions are included. There are no emissions of biogenic CO2. Emissions related to air travel are directly calculated by travel agencies; emissions due to transportation are calculated based on the records of fuel cards; estimates of private means of transportation are obtained by replies to the pertinent questionnaire for year 2015 and emission factors are from Defra and EPA (Carbon Footprint 2015 project).
Emissions related to deliveries of crude and raw materials/ products, intermediate transport & exports 487,775 Only CO2 emissions are included. Method of calculation based on trips and transported quantities.  Emission factors from Second IMO GHG Study 2009.
Total of other indirect GHG emissions 490,381

Base year 2013; emissions related to deliveries of crude and raw materials / products, intermediate transport & exports were included in the calculation.

Total other indirect emissions of the base year emissions were calculated as 283,038 tn CO2.

 

G4-EN18

Emission Intensity Index

BEA BEE BEΘ SUBSIDIARIES
(OKTA=A, EKO=B, HF=C, DIAXON=D, HPC=Ε, EKO SERBIA=Ζ, EKO BULGARIA=H, JUGOPETROL=G)
Units Comments
0.19 0.38 0.16 N/A tn CO2 eq/ tn total distribution

Tons CO2 eq per ton of total distribution.

It includes emissions related to CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs and concerns direct (Scope 1), indirect (Scope 2) and other indirect (Scope 3) emissions.

 

G4-EN19

Reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission (in 2015)

Environmental Indicators per Facility BEA BEE ΒΕΘ SUBSIDIARIES
(OKTA=A, EKO=B, HF=C, DIAXON=D, HPC=Ε, EKO SERBIA=Ζ, EKO BULGARIA=H, JUGOPETROL=G)
Units Comments
Scope 1: Direct GHG emissions from sources owned or controlled by the Group, eg CO2 from fuel consumption. 1,291
(A')
135,952
(C')
0 3,220 (A:OKTA)
(C')
tn CO2 eq

It refers only to CO2 emissions, whose reduction is calculated based on the amounts of consumption compared to 2014 (base year). Reductions reported by the three refineries only related to direct and indirect emissions (Scope 1 & 2).

No reductions in Scope 3
(Scope 3: Other indirect GHG emissions, which is the result of the organization's activities, but from sources not owned or controlled by the organization and use of products and services).

Methodology:

Scope 1: BEA – Calculation,

ΒΕΕ & ΟΚΤΑ – Estimation &

Scope 2: ΒΕΑ,  ΒΕΕ & ΒΕΘ: Calculation

ΟΚΤΑ: Estimation

The following table presents the actions that these reductions may occur. The symbol next to the number in each cell corresponds to the symbol of this table.

A' Fuel switching
B' Use of RES
C' Improved energy efficiency
D' Co-generation
E' Other

 

Scope 2: Indirect greenhouse gas emissions resulting from the production of electricity, heating, cooling and steam which is purchased or acquired for own consumption by the Group. 201,189
(D')
88,330
(D')
952
(D')
1,525 (A:OKTA)
(C')

 

G4-EN20

Emissions of ozone-depleting substances (ODS)

Environmental Indicators per Facility BEA BEE ΒΕΘ SUBSIDIARIES
(OKTA=A, EKO=B, HF=C, DIAXON=D, HPC=Ε, EKO SERBIA=Ζ, EKO BULGARIA=H, JUGOPETROL=G)
Units Comments
HCFCs 0 0 0 - tn CFC-11 eq Substance R-22. EFs are from IPCC, 2013: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Calculation based on the material-losses of these substances.

 

G4-EN21

NOx, SΟx and other significant gaseous emissions 

Environmental Indicators per Facility BEA BEE ΒΕΘ SUBSIDIARIES
(OKTA=A, EKO=B, HF=C, DIAXON=D, HPC=Ε, EKO SERBIA=Ζ, EKO BULGARIA=H, JUGOPETROL=G)
Units Comments
NOx 2,253 695 358 13.5
(A, D)
tn

Calculation based on annual reports PRTR.

EFs from 3/15 report of CONCAWE.

SOx emissions resulting from the percentage of sulfur in fuel, through calculations.

There are no emissions of persistent organic pollutants (POP - Persistent Organic Pollutant).

HAP: through estimations, mainly benzene emissions and concentrations of heavy metals in particles (such as Ni, As, Cd, Hg).

NOx Emission Intensity Index 0.32 0.12 0.08 N/A* Kg/ tn throughput
SOx 4,007 1,465 921 28.1
(A, D)
tn
SΟx Emission Intensity Index 0.56 0.25 0.22 N/A* Kg/ tn throughput
VOC 1,021 354 217 12.3
(A, B, C, D)
tn
VOCs Emission Intensity Index 0.12 0.06 0.05 N/A* Kg/ tn total distribution
PMs 142 41.1 40.3 0.9
(A, D)
tn
PMs Emission Intensity Index 0.02 0.01 0.01 N/A* Kg/ tn throughput
HAP (Hazardous air pollutants) 29.1 5.2 0 0 tn

 

G4-EN22

Total water discharge by quality and destination

Environmental Indicators per Facility BEA BEE ΒΕΘ SUBSIDIARIES
(OKTA=A, EKO=B, HF=C, DIAXON=D, HPC=Ε, EKO SERBIA=Ζ, EKO BULGARIA=H, JUGOPETROL=G)
Units Comments
Volume 2,073,393 3,364,587 1,248,146 704,847 m3 The measured quantities derived from flow-meters.There were no planned discharges. No reuse by other organization. 
Destination Saronikos gulf Saronikos gulf Thermaikos gulf N/A*  
Treatment method The Group’s facilities effluent treatment units include treatment of 1st, 2nd and, occasionally, 3rd level.
H/C index 1.45 3.27 1.86 N/A* gr HC / th throughput

 

G4-EN23

Total weight of waste by type and disposal method

Environmental Indicators per Facility BEA BEE ΒΕΘ SUBSIDIARIES
(OKTA=A, EKO=B, HF=C, DIAXON=D, HPC=Ε, EKO SERBIA=Ζ, EKO BULGARIA=H, JUGOPETROL=G)
Units Comments
Total 4,453 1,498 5,152 4,399 tn

Priority is the waste management in site (within the premises).

If this is not possible; specialized waste management companies take care of the waste management. 

The treatment and handling method is selected in accordance with the Article 4 of the European Directive 2008/98/EC "waste management hierarchy".

Hazardous (total) 1,221 1,366 43 1,046
Non-Hazardous (total) 3,232 132 5,109 3,352
Reused Hazardous 21 0 0 75
Reused Non-Hazardous 0 0 0 132
Recycled Hazardous 11 0 0 11
Recycled Non-Hazardous 888 0 64 360
Recovered Hazardous 1,189 1,366 35 957
Recovered Non-Hazardous 2,102 132 16 457
Incinerated -Hazardous 0 0 0 0
Incinerated -Non-Hazardous 243 0 0 0
Landfill Hazardous 0 0 8 4
Landfill Non-Hazardous 0 0 5,029 2,403

 

G4-EN24

Total number and volume of significant spills

Environmental Indicators per Facility BEA BEE ΒΕΘ SUBSIDIARIES
(OKTA=A, EKO=B, HF=C, DIAXON=D, HPC=Ε, EKO SERBIA=Ζ, EKO BULGARIA=H, JUGOPETROL=G)
Units Comments
Total number of significant spills to soil surface and ground water. 0 0 0 0 # Significant spill is a hydrocarbon spill greater than 100 bbls; or any H/C spill released into a sensitive environment (e.g. protected area, habitat, river, lake, etc.); or any non-H/C spill that has significant environmental impact due to e.g. the toxicity of the substance, elevated salinity, acidity etc.

 

G4-EN25

Weight of exported waste deemed hazardous

Environmental Indicators per Facility ΒΕΑ ΒΕΕ ΒΕΘ SUBSIDIARIES
(OKTA=A, EKO=B, EK=Γ, DIAXON=Δ, HPC=Ε, EKO SERBIA=Ζ, EKO BULGARIA=H, JUGOPETROL=Θ)
Units Comments
Quantity - 167.7 8.2 907.5
(Α, Β)
tn There is no transported, imported, processed waste from abroad.
Percentage - 12.86 0.16 Ν/Α* %
 
G4-EN26

Identity, size, protected status, and biodiversity value of water bodies and related habitats significantly affected by the organization’s discharges of water and runoff

No affected ecosystems.  See also ΕΝ11 and ΕΝ13.

G4-EN27

Extent of impact mitigation of environmental impacts of products and services

ΒΕΑ ΒΕΕ ΒΕΘ SUBSIDIARIES
(OKTA=A, EKO=B, EK=Γ, DIAXON=Δ, HPC=Ε, EKO SERBIA=Ζ, EKO BULGARIA=H, JUGOPETROL=Θ)
Units Comments

It is underlined that fuels launched before 2015 still have lower sulfur content compared with specifications. In addition, ΕΚΟ’s petrol 95 Εkonomy and ΕΚΟ’s diesel Εkonomy assure a reduction of fuel consumption of 2% and 4% respectively. Moreover, BP’s petrol Ultimate 95 and BP’ diesel Ultimate Diesel provide, on average, extra 12 and 42 kilometers per filling, respectively, compared to conventional fuel. The new fuel Diesel Avio, launched in 2014, offers excellent engine cleaning results and, thus, reduction of fuel consumption. Recent studies for Diesel Avio have shown that there is a 24.2% reduction in particulate emissions (PMs) and 1.9% reduction in CO2 emissions in relation to conventional fuels.

Parameters such as liquid waste, noise, and solid waste do not apply to the kind of the Group's products - liquid fuels.
 
G4-EN28

Percentage of products sold and their packaging materials that are reclaimed by category

N/A for refineries products.  Packaging materials are not in use since fuels are transported via pipelines, tank trucks and ships.

G4-EN29

Monetary value of significant fines and total number of non-monetary sanctions for non-compliance with environmental laws and regulations

Environmental Indicators per Facility BEA BEE ΒΕΘ SUBSIDIARIES
(OKTA=A, EKO=B, HF=C, DIAXON=D, HPC=Ε, EKO SERBIA=Ζ, EKO BULGARIA=H, JUGOPETROL=G)
Units Comments
Significant fines for non-compliance with environmental laws and regulations (total). 0 255,400 0 22,900
(Β)

There was no case of non-monetary sanction.

There was no case resolved by dispute resolution mechanisms.

There was no case where the Group did not identify any non-compliance with law or regulations.

G4-EN30

Significant environmental impacts of transporting products and other goods and materials for the organization’s operations, and transporting members of the workforce

The company, in order to quantify the environmental impact caused by personnel commuting, studied its employees’ commuting approaches related to the administrations buildings (HQs, BEA, BEE & ΒΕΘ). 

The 2015 study showed that approximately ~23% of the above mentioned employees use either public transportation or company’s buses instead of private cars (total emissions from road travel 2,280 tCO2-eq).

Based on Euro 6 specifications, emissions of other pollutants because of these commuting approaches (besides public transport) are:

CO 5.22 tn
PM 0.03 tn
NOx 0.46 tn
Total H/C 0.37 tn

In addition, the Group is sponsor of the initiative "Save more fuel" and contributed to the edition of a catalogue with guidelines on ecodriving, http://www.savemorethanfuel.eu/greece/index.html

The most significant impact of the transportation of the products results from sea-transport (exports). It has been calculated that, for the transport by ship, the energy consumed is 2,165 TJ and the related emissions are 169,763 tn CO2.

G4-EN31

Total environmental protection expenditures and investments by type

Environmental Indicators per Facility ΒΕΑ ΒΕΕ ΒΕΘ SUBSIDIARIES
(OKTA=A, EKO=B, EK=Γ, DIAXON=Δ, HPC=Ε, EKO SERBIA=Ζ, EKO BULGARIA=H, JUGOPETROL=Θ)
Units Comments
TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL & ENERGY SAVING INVESTMENTS 5,455,452 1,696,023 1,063,993 2,710,0581  
Energy saving (Total) 3,631,320 73,105 105,668 -
Energy saving investments 3,631,320 73,105 105,668 -
Environment (Total) 1,824,131 1,622,918 958,325 2,710,058
Waste treatment and disposal 658,786 1,016,578 844,337 806,210
Abatement technologies for air emissions, eg. filters 730,039 6,318 - 1,016,563
Certifications fees (EMAS, ISO 14001, CO2 verification, etc) 24,872 51,540 28,219 47,232
Equipment maintenance cost, contractor personnel 113,297 7,855 74,401 602,145
Insurance costs for environmental liability Insurance costs for environmental liability is included at the Group’s total insurance cost and cannot be reported separately. Total insurance includes insurance for compliance with environmental legislation (insurance related to hazardous waste management) and excludes insurance for prevention and repair damage to the environment in accordance to Presidential Decree 148/2009 because of lack of the necessary supportive legislative framework.
Clean up and remediation cost following leaks, etc 265,236 525,223 - 234,108
Other costs – Chemical Analysis 31,902 15,404 11,369 3,800
 

1 HQ's investments are included

 

G4-EN32

Percentage of new suppliers that were screened using environmental criteria

All new suppliers are evaluated using questionnaire which includes criteria on environmental performance. No significant findings in 2015.

G4-EN33

Significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts in the supply chain and actions taken

Active suppliers are evaluated using questionnaire which includes criteria on impact on society and environmental performance. In 2015 more than 250 questionnaires were completed; their evaluation presented no significant findings.

G4-EN34

Number of grievances about environmental impacts filed, addressed and resolved through formal grievance mechanisms

Environmental Indicators per Facility ΒΕΑ ΒΕΕ ΒΕΘ SUBSIDIARIES
(OKTA=A, EKO=B, EK=Γ, DIAXON=Δ, HPC=Ε, EKO SERBIA=Ζ, EKO BULGARIA=H, JUGOPETROL=Θ)
Units Comments

Number of grievances about environmental impacts filed, addressed, and resolved through formal grievance mechanisms

2 2 1 0 # Complaints reported in 2014 and resolved within the same year, according to the standard procedure.
Number of grievances addressed in 2015 2 2 1 0
Number of grievances resolved in 2015 2 2 1 0
 

Labour Practices & Decent Work

G4- LA1

Total number and rates of new employee hires and employee turnover by age group, gender, and region.

  p. 40  (Ch. "Human Capital”)

 New hires by age group and gender
  <30 30-50 >50
 HELPE M 48 41 11
F 7 5 0
 ASPROFOS M 0 4 0
F 0 0 0
 ΕΚΟ BULGARIA M 1 4 0
F 5 2 0
 DIAXON 0 0 0
 JUGOPETROL M 2 3 0
F 5 6 0
 ΟΚΤΑ M 1 1 0
F 4 2 0
 HP CYPRUS M 1 1 0
F 1 2 0
 HF M 6 10 0
F 4 3 0
 EKΟ M 1 0 1
F 0 0 0

Zero new hires turnover

 Employees turnover by age group and gender
  <30 30-50 >50
 HELPE M 4 15 10
F 6 2 0
 ASPROFOS M 0 0 3
F 0 0 0
 ΕΚΟ BULGARIA M 1 4 0
F 2 4 0
 ΕΚΟ SERBIA M 0 3 0
F 0 0 0
 DIAXON   0 0 0
 JUGOPETROL M 2 11 26
F 0 4 3
 ΟΚΤΑ M 0 2 0
F 0 0 0
 HP CYPRUS M 1 0 3
F 1 2 0
 HF M 2 7 0
F 4 2 0
 ΕΚΟ M 0 1 0
F 0 0               0               

 Percentage of employees who stay in the Group (loyalty indicator 96.3%).

 HELPE 98.1%
 ΕΚΟ 99.6%
 HF 92.7%
 DIAXON 100%
 ASPROFOS 98%
 HP CYPRUS 87.3%
 EKO BULGARIA 81.4%
 EKO SERBIA 91.9%
 JUGOPETROL 60.34%
 OKTA 99.5%
G4- LA2

Benefits provided to full-time employees, who are not provided to temporary or part-time employees, by significant locations of operation.

HELPE-ΕΚΟ-ΗF
The benefits provided in Collective Agreements and Internal Labour Regulations concern employees with an indefinite time contract and not employees under fixed-term contract, full or part-time regardless of where they work.

Type of employee benefit Fixed-term contract,
Full-time
Indefinite time contract
Pension plan through group contracts - v
Medical plan through Life & Health Group Contract - v
Financial support for serious health situations - v
Employees’ children camping - v
Wedding/birth/death allowance - v
School allowance - v
University studies allowance - v
Vouchers/gifts on Easter & Christmas/ financial support for families with many children - v
Support to employees’ family members with special needs - v
Financial aid awards for distinguished pupils-students (employees’ children) successful in Universities & Colleges - v
Crèche allowance - v
Long service anniversary gifts - v
Employees’ loans - v
Free staff commuting  v v
Free light lunch v v

 

Company Type of Employees’ benefits
Life insurance Helathcare Disability and invalidity coverage Parental leave Retirement provision Stock ownership
HELPE v v   v v  
EKO v v   v v  
HF v v   v v  
DIAXON   v   v v  
ASPROFOS   v   v v  
OKTA   v   v v  
HELPE CYPRUS v v   v v  
JUGOPETROL   v   v v  
EKO BULGARIA   v   v v  
EKO SERBIA   v   v v  

 

Furthermore:

ΑSPROFOS

Company’s benefits are provided to all employees

DIAXON

Benefits to indefinite contract employees (discount vouchers are also provided to temporary employees and partially to students trainees) are: summer camps, childcare allowance, loans, school allowance, students’ allowance, award to employees’ children for excel school or university performance, financial support to learn foreign languages, wedding/birth/death allowance, financial support to employees with many children and children with special needs.

JUGOPETROL

Full time and part time employees have equal rights.

ΕΚΟ SERBIA

Lap top, mobile, private health insurance and EKO discount card only to employees with indefinite time contract.

ΗΡ CYPRUS

Medical and life insurance program to all employees

ΟΚΤΑ

Financial support for employees’ children who are pupils/students, Xmas – Easter gifts, holiday allowance.

EKO & HF: benefits for fixed-term employees
Preventive medical tests
Marriage/birth allowance
Discount vouchers
Crèche allowance
Gifts on safety goals achievements
Children summer camps

Significant location of operation is an area neighboring to Group’s industrial facilities.

G4- LA3

Return to work and retention rates after parental leave, by gender.

Complying with the relevant legislation all employees are entitled to maternity / paternity leave.

During 2015, 42 (F) employees (18 from HELPE, 4 from EKO, 4 from HF, 4 from OKTA, 1 from JPK, 4 from EKO SERBIA and  7 from EKO Bulgaria) and 3 (M) employees from DIAXON  got parental leave.

Moreover, 18 (F) employees who got parental leave ended in 2015 and 15 (F) employees who got parental leave ended in 2014, returned to their work.

Group’s average return to work rate for 2015= 93.2%

G4- LA4

Minimum notice periods regarding operational changes, including whether these are specified in collective agreements.

Minimum 1 month and maximum 3 months.

For changes involving groups of individuals management  issues relevant announcements. Information means include  personal letters, memos, management decisions, councils notifications, etc.

Any change in conditions of individual contract is disclosed to interested parties under the provisions of PD 156/94 within one month of the upcoming change.

Depending on the local/national legislation, the minimum notice period might vary, eg in Bulgaria and Skopje the minimum period is 30 days, in Montenegro 15-90 days depending on the type of change (30 days according to collective agreements), in Serbia 10 days, while in Cyprus adequate time and support are provided (notice period is covered by law).

G4- LA5

Percentage of total workforce represented in formal joint management–worker health and safety committees, that help monitor and advise on occupational health and safety programs.

All staff (100%) is represented. The committees participate in regular meetings with the facility management and make recommendations for improvement in the workplace with regard to Health and Safety.

  p. 44-45, Ch. "Human Capital”, Sections “Occupational H & S” and “Occupational Risk Management”

G4- LA6

Type of injury and rates of injury, occupational diseases, lost days and absenteeism and total number of work related fatalities, by region and by gender.

  p. 46-47, (Ch. “Human Capital”, Table “Number of Incidents based on CONCAWE’s Guidelines”)

Injuries breakdown, by gender, is now recorded at all facilities. The safety indicators, by gender, for the BEA, BEE & BEΘ complexes and the Group’s subsidiaries are presented in the two following tables. Definitions of the indicators are in the Glossary of the CSR Report :

  ΒΕΑ ΒΕΕ ΒΕΘ
M/F
Fatalities (own staff) 3/0 0 0
Fatalities (contractors) 1/0 0 0
LWIF (own staff) 7.45/0.83 0 0
LWIF (contractors) 1.09/1.45 0 5.60/0
AIF (own staff) 10.77/0.83 3.51/0 0
AIF (contractors) 1.45/1.45 0 5.60/0
IR (own staff) (10-6) 10.77/0.83 3.51/0 0
IR (contractors) (10-6) 1.45/1.45 0 5.60/0
LWIS (own staff) 37.11/15 0 0
LWIS (contractors) 32.67/10.25 0 130/0
ODR (own staff)  0 0 0
ODR (contractors) 0 0 0
LDR* (own staff) (10-5) 26.62/1.24 0/0 0/0
LDR* (contractors) (10-5) 3.55/1.48 0/0 16.98/0
Absentee rate (own staff) N.A. 2.2/2.9 4.53/7.9

*concern only the days of absence due to accident

  HQ's EKO HF DIAXON HP CYPRUS ASPROFOS OKTA EKO SERBIA EKO BULGARIA JUGOPETROL
Fatalities (own staff) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fatalities (contractors) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LWIF (own staff) 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.38/1.34 0 0 0
LWIF (contractors) 0/3.93 6.77/1.69 0 15.24/0 0 0 N.A. 0 0 6.61/0
AIF (own staff) 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.38/1.34 0 0 0
AIF (contractors) 0/3.93 6.77/1.69 0 30.49/0 0 0 N.A. 0 0 6.61/0
IR (own staff) (10-6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.38/1.34 0 0 0
IR (contractors) (10-6) 0/3.93 6.77/1.69 0 30.49/0 0 0 N.A. 0 0 6.61/0
LWIS (own staff) 0 0 0 0 0 0 70/7 0 0 0
LWIS (contractors) 0/20 6.5/15 0 50/0 0 0 N.A. 0 0 39.5/0
ODR (own staff) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ODR (contractors) 0 27.10/0** 0 0 0 0 N.A. 0 0 0
LDR (own staff) (10-5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.41/0.94 0 0 0
LDR (contractors) (10-5) 0/0.79 2.25/1.30 0 75.75/0 0 0 N.A. 0 0 14.95/0
Absentee rate (own staff) N.A. 1.16/3.11 0.49/4.02 2.67/2.05 N.A. N.A. 1.19/0.82

0.63/2.14

N.A. N.A.

 

Clarifications:

  • The used system of rules is in accordance with the CONCAWE’s definitions and OSHA’s  “Recordkeeping guidelines’’.
  • The Absentee rate (AR) is monitored at specific facilities and only for HELPE’s personnel. 
  • No records concerning occupational diseases.

For lost work days incidents (LWI) the days of absence are calendar. First day of absence is considered the day after the accident. The accidents classification, this year too, took place in accordance with the definitions of CONCAWE (LWI, RWI, MTC, PSE). According to CONCAWE, LWIs, in 2015, were further analyzed in the following categories:

HELPE, ΕΚΟ, HF INJURY TYPE No of LWIs)
Group's employees   10
Contractors' employees   15
Road accident Road accident 0
Height/Falls Falls from height 2
Staff hit by falling objects 1
Slips & trips (same height) 11
Burn/Electric shock Explosion or burns 7
Electric shock 1
Confined Space   Confined Space inury 0
Other accident type

Assault or violence

0
Drowning or water related accident 0
Minor injuries (Cut, puncture, scrape) 1
Blow 0
Exposure to noise, chemical, biological, vibration 0
Trapped under or between 0
Over exertion, strain 2
Pressure release 0
Other 0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

G4- LA7

Workers with high incidence or high risk of diseases related to their occupation.

There are no workers with high incidence or high risk of diseases related to their occupation.

In cases of serious disease or loss of a family member, the company provides support by a psychologist or social worker.

At the facilities’ infirmaries, the physicians and other external experts train the shift working employees on First Aid provision, handling of respirators (recovery from major accidents), means of rescue from confined workplaces, etc.

The Group’s companies, ad hoc, inform their employees in case of diseases or whenever seasonal viral outbreak is observed, (by emails, bulletin boards, announcements on notice boards, etc).

G4- LA8

Report whether formal agreements (either local or global) with trade unions cover health and safety.

  p. 75, facilities certification in accordance with OHSAS 18001/ΕΛΟΤ 1801.

H & S issues, agreed in collective agreements with employees’ unions, refer to the Internal Labour Regulations, which is accessible on the corporate intranet. An agreement is signed among the Group’s companies and the relevant employee unions concerning safety personnel in case of strike.

Internal Protection and Prevention Service (ESYPP) operates under PD95 / 1999; aiming at employees’ occupational health monitoring and taking protective measures to avoid accidents.

Occupational Health and Safety Committees (EYAE) operating at each facility, consisting of elected representatives of employees and representing all employees, under PD1568 /1985. Any employee (100%) may participate in the elections for EYAE at the facility where he/she is working. The committees participate in periodic meetings with the facility management making suggestions for improvements in their workplace, as far as occupational health and safety are concerned. Records of  the meetings are kept, including agreed progress and implementation rate. The dates of the meetings are part of the annual report of the Internal Protection & Prevention Committee to the Ministry of Labour, Social Security and Social Solidarity.

Related reference at:

  • HELPE’s  Internal Regulation, Articles 8, 24, 40
  • EKO’s  & HF’s  Internal Regulation,  Articles 9, 12, 23
  • Group’s Code of Conduct, chapter 7.1

Outsourced Protection & Prevention Services (ΕXYPP): Where appropriate (eg during periods of general maintenance) to monitor the occupational H & S activities additional properly qualified external partner (EXYPP) is mobilised.  Relevant  indicators are  monitored and the relevant labour legislation is applied.

The H & S issues are covered 100% by local agreements or regulations or official procedures, the Health and Safety employees’ commission, with the participation of Safety Technician and Occupational Physician, at periodic H & S meetings with colleagues at other Group’s facilities, also as part of ESYPP activities.

There are also formal agreements covering issues such as:

  • Provision and use of personal protection equipment
  • Participation of employee representatives in inspections
  • Education and information on H & S
  • Submission of complaints
  • Right to refuse dangerous work
G4- LA9

Average hours of training per year per employee by gender and by employee category.

  p. 50, 53, 54 (Ch. “Human Capital”, Sections “Education & Training”, “Health & Safety Training” and “Environmental Training”).

Statistical information concerning training expenses, training hours and breakdown by number of trainees, gender and training issue are presented in "Sustainable Development & Corporate Responsibility Report 2015’’ (p. 52-53, Tables with employees and training breakdown).

The Group’s total expenditure on education amounted to € 780,766 and the total number of training hours was 60,648.

Indicatively, in-house seminars of 41,150  hours, on Health, Safety and Fire Prevention, were conducted during 2015.

Average hours of training per employee by employee category

Company Management Operators
HELPE 12.2 22.5
ΕΚΟ 13.1 9.8
HF 22.2 18.3
DIAXON 41.7 2.6
ASPROFOS 31.7 12.8
ΟΚΤΑ 30.5 6.9
ΕΚΟ SERBIA 35.58 16.23
HP CYPRUS 48.6 16.7
EKO BULGARIA 29.17 54
JUGOPETROL 175.6 5.8

 

Average hours of training per employee by gender
Company M F
HELPE 22.9 12.6
ΕΚΟ 10.4 9.9
HF 15.8 25.9
DIAXON 3.8 3.6
ASPROFOS 16.9 12.7
ΟΚΤΑ 7.1 15.9
ΕΚΟ SERBIA 28.3 19.9
HP CYPRUS 27.5 10.6
EKO BULGARIA 46 52.3
JUGOPETROL 36.79 28.24

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

G4- LA10

Programs for skills management and lifelong learning, that support the continued employability of employees and assist them in managing career endings.

The HR Department, supporting lifelong learning, aims for continuous improvement of skills of employees by implementing long in-house education & training programs to ensure the "continuous employment". Indicative topics covered by these programs are: learning English, economics for non-economics, legal for non-legal persons, principles of management, basic management skills and techniques of effective presentations. See also "Sustainable Development & CSR Report 2015’’, Chapter “The human Capital”, Section "Training and Education".

In case of employee resignation or retirement:

  • a compensating payment is provided, taken into account the age and experience.
  • a supporting program helping to find another job is available.

The Group brings to an end labour contracts, usually, when employees meet the conditions for full retirement.

G4- LA11

Percentage of employees receiving regular performance and career development reviews, by gender and by employee category.

For senior and top management, the evaluation is made annually based on KPIs and links the performance of the company with the objectives of the staff, on issues such as sustainable development (safety, environment, etc.).

% of employees receiving regular performance and career development review, per company

HELPE 100
EKO 100
HF 100
ASPROFOS 99.68
DIAXON 97.92
EKO SERBIA 97.3
JUGOPETROL 99.76
OKTA 100
EKO BULGARIA 40
HP CYPRUS 100

 

G4- LA12

Composition of governance bodies and breakdown of employees per employee category, according to gender, age group, minority group membership and other indicators of diversity.

  p. 55

 Ratio of executive / no-executive members of the BoD was 4/9, in 2015.

The breakdown of the 84 board members (of the Group’s companies included in this Report) by gender and age group is as follows : 

55 BoD members in 10 companies
Gender Age Group
<30 30-50 >50
M 0 27 50
F 0 3 4

On average 11.4% of women are in senior management, (HELPE 19.61%, ΕΚΟ 23.81%, HF 15.79%,  ASPROFOS 1.75%, JUGOPETROL 11.11%, EKO SERBIA 0%,  HP CYPRUS  0%, EKO BULGARIA 25%, OKTA 16.67%).

 p. 41-43 (tables with  employees breakdown  in Chapter "Human Capital”)

At the end of 2015, the Group employed, as permanent employees, 94 people with special needs.

Employees breakdown per gender, age group, nationality:

AGE GROUP HELPE ΕΚΟ HF ASPROFOS
M F M F M F M F
<30 6.1% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 8.3% 8.2% 0% 0%
30-50 58.4% 9.5% 38.6% 28.6% 46.1% 20.9% 29.8% 24.5%
>50 23.4% 2.2% 25.4% 6.6% 13.6% 2.9% 32.5% 13.2%

 

AGE GROUP DIAXON EKO BULGARIA JUGOPETROL EKO SERBIA HP CYPRUS OKTA
M F M F M F M F M F M F
<30 0% 0% 6.8% 10.2% 3.4% 6.9% 2.7% 0% 0% 3.6% 5.8% 2.8%
30-50 80.2% 15.6% 39% 32.2% 29.3% 27.6% 29.8% 56.8% 43.6% 25.6% 14% 7.7%
>50 4.2% 0% 6.8% 5% 24.2% 8.6% 2.7% 8% 23.6% 3.6% 60.7% 9%

 

Employees breakdown by nationality & gender
Nationality M F
Greek 2.201 470
fYROM 303 75
Serbian 29 27
Cypriot 37 18
Bulgarian 32 28
Montenegrin 67 49
Albanian 8 1
Croatian 0 2
German 1 0
Romanian 1 0
Turkish 1 0
Slovenian 1 0

 

 

G4- LA13

Ratio of basic salary and remuneration of women to men by employee category and by significant locations of operation.

Non-material issue because the Group does not follow any differentiation between men and women on the payroll.

The salary is based on annual evaluations and follows the Greek and EU legislation on equal pay. Based on the principle of equality there is no discrimination or other economic differentiations in any company.

G4- LA14

Percentage of new suppliers, who were screened using labor practices criteria.

The evaluation of all new suppliers is based on questionnaire that also includes criteria for workplace practices.

No significant findings in 2015.

G4- LA15

Significant actual and potential negative impacts for labor practices in the supply chain and actions taken.

Active suppliers are evaluated by questionnaire that also includes criteria for labor practices.

In 2015, the evaluation of more than 250 filled in questionnaires did not reveal any significant findings. 

G4- LA16

Number of grievances about labor practices filed, addressed and resolved through formal grievance mechanisms.

Through the Employee Suggestion Program (See "Sustainable Development & Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2015’’, Chapter "Human Capital”, Section "Work Environment’’) employees’ grievances are filed and resolved (1 H & S issue in 2015).

ΟΚΤΑ

1 grievance about labor practices filed, addressed and resolved through formal grievance mechanism

EKO Serbia none

HP Cyprus none

Montenegro: 1 grievance addressed during the reporting period which is still ongoing and not resolved yet.

Human Rights

G4-HR1

Total number and percentage of significant investment agreements and contracts that include human rights clauses or that underwent human rights screening

The Code of Conduct (sections 7.2 & 7.3) and the Internal Labour Regulations (article 2.3) provide guidance on the protection of human rights throughout the supply chain.

Both documents make clear references to the respect of the human rights. Furthermore, all employees have been trained on both documents, which are accessible by all employees in the corporate network. Copies of them have been distributed throughout the Group.

A clause making reference to the Sustainable Procurement is scheduled to be included in revising the Procurement Regulations (2016). In addition, since 2015, a compliance clause with the UNGC principles   is part of new contracts and purchase orders .

In 2015, the screening percentage was zero.

The Group’s companies, where appropriate, use evaluation questionnaires, covering topics such as child labour, respect to human rights, labour rights, equal opportunities, H & S, etc.

G4-HR2

Total hours of employee training on human rights policies or procedures concerning aspects of human rights that are relevant to operations, including the percentage of employees trained

100% of employees were trained to HR issues through the company’s Internal Labour Regulation (articles 22, 23, 26, 38 & 39) and the Code of Conduct (section 7), which are available to all employees via  intranet.

The following actions are indirect ways of training on human rights:

  • Employee participation in awareness workshops on CSR, Sustainability Reporting, GRI certification
  • Educational Seminars for CSR (Edge & Edge-Commercial in Athens and Thessaloniki) to groups of employees
  • The Corporate Responsibility Report Working Group (see G4-49) has been established in order to support issues on Sustainability Reporting
G4-HR3

Total number of incidents of discrimination and corrective actions taken

The HR Division monitors such phenomena and acts accordingly in cooperation with the union of employees.

No relevant reports in 2015.

G4-HR4

Operations and suppliers identified in which the right to exercise freedom of association and collective bargaining may be violated or at significant risk, and measures taken to support these rights

The HR & Procurement Divisions (in cooperation with the union of employees, where appropriate) monitor such phenomena and act accordingly.
In 2015 there were no reports on  violations of the right to freedom of association.

The evaluation of the received questionnaires from suppliers did not reveal any significant findings for 2015.

Relevant awareness / training of employees took place through the Code of Conduct and Internal Regulations.
Concerning Suppliers, a clause concerning compliance  of our suppliers with the principles of the UN Global Compact (in the areas of human rights, labor, environment and corruption)  has been incorporated in new contracts and purchase orders.

G4-HR5

Operations and suppliers identified as having significant risk for incidents of child labor, and measures taken to contribute to the effective abolition of child labor

The HR & Procurement Divisions (in cooperation with the union of employees, where appropriate) monitor such phenomena and act accordingly. In 2015 there were no relevant reports.
The recruitment policy of the Group has a lower limit for recruitment the age of 18 years.

The evaluation of the received questionnaires from suppliers did not reveal any significant findings for 2015.

Relevant awareness/ training of employees took place through the Code of Conduct and Internal Regulations.
Concerning Suppliers, a clause concerning compliance  of our suppliers with the principles of the UN Global Compact (in the areas of human rights, labor, environment and corruption)  has been incorporated in new contracts and purchase orders.

G4-HR6

Operations and suppliers identified as having significant risk for incidents of forced or compulsory labor, and measures to contribute to the elimination of all forms of forced or compulsory labor

The HR & Procurement Divisions monitor such phenomena and act accordingly (in cooperation with the union of employees and the work councils, where appropriate).
In 2015 there were no relevant reports.

The evaluation of the received questionnaires from suppliers did not reveal any significant findings for 2015.

Relevant awareness / training of employees took place through the Code of Conduct and Internal Regulations.
Concerning Suppliers, a clause concerning compliance  of our suppliers with the principles of the UN Global Compact (in the areas of human rights, labor, environment and corruption)  has been incorporated in new contracts and purchase orders.

G4-HR7

Percentage of security personnel trained in the organization’s human rights policies or procedures that are relevant to operations.

The security personnel provided by the companies we cooperate  with, have a formal certification and license to practice. They are certified from the Center for Security Studies and the National Organization for the Certification of Qualifications & Vocational Guidance as qualified security personnel . To acquire certification  & license they are trained to procedures related to the protection of human rights.

All Group’s security personnel (Group Security Division) is certified from the Center for Security Studies and the National Organization for the Certification of Qualifications & Vocational Guidance as qualified security personnel properly trained. The certification process included a special topic concerning human rights and related issues.

There are no armed guards at the premises of the Group.

G4-HR8

Total number of incidents of violations involving rights of indigenous peoples and actions taken

Not material issue. There are no such cases.

G4-HR9

Total number and percentage of operations that have been subject to human rights reviews orimpact assessments.

There were no reviews or assessments as there has been no reported or related problem.

G4-HR10

Percentage of new suppliers that were screened using human rights criteria

All new suppliers are evaluated via questionnaire which also includes criteria on respect for human rights.
No significant findings in 2015.

G4-HR11

Significant actual and potential negative human rights impacts in the supply chain and actions taken

 

Active suppliers are evaluated by questionnaire that also includes criteria on human rights.

In 2015, the evaluation of 250 filled in questionnaires did not reveal any significant findings.

G4-HR12

Number of grievances about human rights impacts filed, addressed, and resolved through formal grievance mechanisms

The HR Division monitors phenomena of human rights violation and acts accordingly.

No grievances in 2015.

Society

G4-SO1

Percentage of operations with implemented local community engagement, impact assessments, and development programs

 

In 2013, a opinion surveys were conducted, on materiality analysis and stakeholder engagement In 2014 a Qualitative & Quantitative Survey (Company Reputation Monitor), in local communities, took place. In 2015 the materiality analysis and stakeholder engagement surveys were repeated.

Such surveys, regular communication and consultation are used to determine the investment in infrastructure and other actions for the benefit of local communities and to understand the significant indirect effects locally. Assessing the findings will lead in planning activities for next years. It has been recorded that local communities anticipate actions with a focus on supporting the unemployed, health services, in support of elderly and vulnerable groups in general.

 p. 91-95: actions taken in the framework of surveys, consultation and communication with local communities. Analytical presentation, by country (100% operations).

Furthermore, during the design phase of a new investment, provision is made for direct and indirect impacts. Moreover, the operational planning of any investment pays attention to  the study of direct and indirect impacts on the local community.

G4-SO2

Operations with significant actual or potential negative impacts on local communities

By its very nature, our work has an impact on the local community and society as a whole. Community engagement affects our social license to operate. Our impact on our surroundings immediately affects our employees and local suppliers. And our community engagement improves jobs and education in our environment – it contributes to society as well. This requires a constant focus on everything we do to minimise our negative impact and create value for local communities.

Significant impacts may occur in the stages of: entry of a new activity, running or exit from it. Based on the strategy of the Group only the second stage (operation) considered as significant, for the next 5 years.

The operation of the facilities may have environmental impacts (analytically presented at ’Sustainable Development & Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2015’’, Chapter “Environment, Energy & Climate change”: emissions, climate change, pollutants, education, investments, protection of biodiversity), impacts on health and safety (Chapter “Human Capital”) or to the local communities (Chapter “Society”).

G4-SO3

Total number and percentage of operations assessed for risks related to corruption and the significant risks identified

All business units are audited for risks associated with corruption; following standard internal auditing procedure.

The procedure is consistent with the Group’s Code of Conduct.

No relevant report or complaint in 2015.

It is noted that, among the issues examined by Internal Audit during 2015 were:

  • Refineries’ and Commercial Companies’ supply chain Issues
  • Health, Safety and Environmental issues concerning the refineries
  • Issues on proper  implementation of the Procurement Manual procedures

These issues are significant according to Materiality Assessment.

Internal Auditing KPI

Coverage of the annual internal audit program (min=90%)

2013 2014 2015 forcast
130% 110% 122%
G4-SO4

Communication and training on anti-corruption policies and procedures

 

 p. 38

No specific training in 2015.

100% of the employees (5% management employees, with minor differentiation per company) are trained on anticorruption policies and procedures through the Internal Labour Regulation and the Code of Conduct (copies of the documents are available to all employees).

Moreover, all employees (100%) are aware of Group’s commitment on UNGC principles, the corporate policy and values; through the annual Group’s Corporate Responsibility & Sustainability Report (all reports are posted at the Group’s site and intranet).

Additionaly, in Cyprus,  the Code of Contuct was communicated to contractors and customers.

Concerning business partners relevant  communication is ensured by integrating in the cooperation contracts a clause on the compliance with the principles of the UN Global Compact.

G4-SO5

Confirmed incidents of corruption and actions taken

No actions addressing incidents of corruption took place in 2015; as no incident was reported to the relevant committee, the companies’ BoDs or the employees’ union representatives

There is also the possibility to report incidents of corruption to the Office of Compliance.

However, provision there is for administrative and legal measures in accordance with Internal Labour Regulation. Moreover, regular audits are planned by the relevant auditing departments.

G4-SO6

Total value of political contributions by country and recipient/beneficiary

Zero contribution, (such contribution is prohibited by the Group’s Code of Conduct).

G4-SO7

Total number of legal actions for anti-competitive behavior, anti-trust, and monopoly practices and their outcomes

CYPRUS

The Competition Protection Commission has decided to reopen the investigation against the oil companies. In its earlier decision, dated 24.05.2009, a fine of € 14,629,000 was imposed to the company. That decision was annulled by the Supreme Court of Cyprus on 25.05.2011. The case is reviewed by the newly established Committee on the basis of documents obtained in the previous investigation. The investigation is still ongoing.

The above investigation  is independent and separate from the new sectoral inquiry conducted by the CPC; during  which a large number of documents and information has been collected from oil companies and petrol stations.

G4-SO8

Monetary value of significant fines and total number of non-monetary sanctions for non-compliance with laws and regulations

Νο irrevocable fines in 2015.

G4-SO9

Percentage of new suppliers that were screened using criteria for impacts on society

All new suppliers are evaluated using questionnaire which also include criteria on impact on society.

No significant findings in 2015.

G4-SO10

Significant actual and potential negative impacts on society in the supply chain and actions taken

Active suppliers are evaluated by a questionnaire that contains criteria for impact on society.

In this context, in 2015, 250 questionnaires were filled in. Their evaluation did not reveal significant findings.

G4-SO11

Number of grievances about impacts on society filed, addressed, and resolved through formal grievance mechanisms

 p. 65  (Round the Clock Service)

Through the suggestions box  answers to questions - complaints raised by employees are provided  (one complaint related to the environment in 2015).

OKTA: In 2015, four grievances about impacts on society were filed and resolved.

EKO BULGARIA: A small number of customer complaints (72) were reported through the formal grievance mechanisms for the reporting period. All these were addressed and resolved during the period of reference. No  complaints about the impact on society during the reporting period.

SERBIA/CYPRUS: No grievances have been reported during 2015.

No pending complaints from previous years to resolve.

Product Responsibility

G4-PR1

Percentage of significant product and service categories, for which health and safety impacts are assessed for improvement.

  p. 67  (Ch. “Business Partners”, Section “Customer Information”)

Impact assessment is made for the entire lifecycle of each substance and includes the exposure scenarios for every use. For this purpose, accordance with Regulation REACH, there is communication throughout the entire supply chain.

Potential risk assessment for safety, human health and environment has been conducted for the substances of products of the Refineries and Chemical Plants. This assessment has been done for all product phases (production, storage, transport, distribution, use, disposal).

  • The aim is to assess the permissible level of dose/concentration to which humans and environment may be exposed; in order to conclude the proper Risk Management counter Measures (RMMs).
  • The risk assessment is conducted for the entire life cycle of each substance and includes the exposure scenarios for every use. For this purpose, as REACH Regulation requires, there is continuous  communication throughout the entire  supply chain.
  • Products are properly classified and labelled for hazards, in accordance with the European CLP Regulation and adaptation regulations relevant  to technical and scientific developments. The Group’s customers are provided with guidance on safe use through the extended Product Safety Data Sheets (e-SDSs).
G4- PR2

Total number of incidents of non-compliance with regulations and voluntary codes, concerning the health and safety impacts of products and services during their life cycle, by type of outcomes.

No incidents of non-compliance.

EKO Bulgaria: One incident for the reporting period related to the regulatory provided periodical technical test of a gas station. There are no incidents concerning health and safety impact of products and services

G4- PR3

Type of product and service information required by the organization’s procedures for product and service information and labeling, and percentage of significant product and service categories subject to such information requirements.

 p. 67 (Ch. “Business Partners”, Section “Customer Information”)

Copies of Product Material Safety Data Sheet are provided with packaged products such as lubricants; (at Ch. “Business Partners”, Section “Customers – Products”, the Table “Percentage of sales by product for each of the Group’s companies” presents the main products). For the non-packaged products there is no such requirement.

  The sourcing of components of the product or service Content, particularly with regard to substances, that might produce an environmental or social impact Safe use of the product or service Disposal of the product and environmental/social impacts
OKTA YES YES YES YES
HP CYPRUS YES YES YES YES
EKO BULGARIA NO NO YES NO
EKO SERBIA YES YES YES YES
JUGOPETROL YES YES YES YES

 

G4- PR4

Total number of incidents of non-compliance with regulations and voluntary codes, concerning product and service information and labeling, by type of outcomes.

No incidents of non compliance.

In "Corporate Responsibility Report 2015’’, Chapter "Business partners”,  Section "Products & Services Quality’’ describes audits and inspections at petrol stations on the products quality and quantity.

G4- PR5

Results of surveys measuring customer satisfaction.

 p. 65  (Round the clock service)

Moreover, significant findings from the annual customer satisfaction survey Brand Vitality Tracking, by country are:

HP CYPRUS:  

  • Annual survey - 800 interviews with Quotas on age, gender, region representative  to drivers’ population in CYPRUS, identifies the “Views & Attitudes”, “Awareness & Usage”, “Purchase Criteria & Brand Evaluation” and “Habits on car usage & Fuel purchases”. Results indicate that HPC  maintains its leading position in the Cypriot market. Brand name appeared enhanced compared to previous years (37% in 2013, 39% το 2014)   with Top Of Mind score of 40% in 2015. Key conclusion is that HPC should continue communicating its values related to quality and superior service and further invest on promotional activities in a market which is becoming more price sensitive.
  • Annual Retail Mystery Shopper Survey where all HPC’s service stations and 30% of the competitors’ were visited 6-times a year. “Effective  Service offered”, “Staff Appearance & Wearing of Uniforms” and “Politeness” of personnel have been evaluated. The overall  score  for HPC  was 73% vs 65%  of the competitors.
  • EKO fleet card: 2015 satisfaction survey covering 25% of total HPC fleet customers.
    Results: Overall satisfaction score: 8.8 out of 10, Intention to recommend: 9.0 out of 10, Possibility for continuing cooperation: 9 out 10.

 

EKO BULGARIA: Customer satisfaction 94%,  according to  Mystery Motorist Survey, (criteria: politeness, service and appearance).

In the reporting period the fourth wave of Brand Vitality Tracking was performed.

The main insights are:

  • Spontaneous awareness has been strengthened significantly vs. last year. Total awareness increased by 2%.
  • EKO has expanded significantly its customer base. There is a consistent increase throughout years. As a result occasional customers have been doubled.

 

EKO SERBIA:

Customer satisfaction is key brand building policy. In order to improve it, EKO is organizing monthly Mystery motorist audits with very strict and strong standards for customer service, politeness and appearance.  Company also organized market survey (carried out by GFK) in order to get proper info about company market position, brand awareness and other measurement. For the introduction of a new product in the market EKO organizes focus group in order to find out opinion about new product, name and requirements. Customer satisfaction is main part of regular trainings organized every day on different petrol stations, by 3 area trainers and 3 area managers. Result of all those activities is the highest awareness  for customer satisfaction, loyal customers and company image strengthening.

Survey for customer satisfaction with a sample population exceeding 5000 people from all categories (age, gender, employment…). The major findings were:

  • EKO Serbia was recognized  as whole to be one of the best brands in the market with the second lowest rejection rate. In addition, taking into account all criteria, EKO is the most recommended network in Serbia.
  • Major products, that were mostly recognized, are our differentiated fuels. Major services are our SMILE card and our service at the PS
  • A portion of the customers considers that we have good locations especially in Belgrade and central region. The southern and northern regions are recognized as areas where we need more operation locations.

 

OKTA:

RASS annual survey organized by IMA identified steady pace in all indicators - the “Views & Attitudes”, “Awareness & Usage”, “Purchase Criteria & Brand Evaluation” and “Habits on car usage & Fuel purchases”. During 2015 OKTA has managed to maintain the loyal and potential loyal customers, while the brand is mainly described by good service (kind and fast) and additional offer / services.

 

JUGOPETROL: Mystery motorist surveys. Feedback received through complaint books, customer service phone line and through web site.

G4- PR6

Sale of banned or disputed products.

No such cases.

G4- PR7

Total number of incidents of non-compliance with regulations and voluntary codes, concerning marketing communications, including advertising, promotion and sponsorship, by type of outcomes.

No incidents of non compliance.

Full compliance with relevant regulations/ codes (eg. unfair competition and consumer protection).

G4- PR8

Total number of substantiated complaints, regarding breaches of customer privacy and losses of customer data.

No complaints.

Records of personal customer data fully comply with relevant legislation and are fully harmonized with EU law.

G4- PR9

Monetary value of significant fines for non-compliance with laws and regulations, concerning the provision and use of products and services.

No significant fines/ non-compliances.

Full compliance with the relevant legislation on unfair competition and consumer protection.

Montenegro: A report with the findings of tax audit (June 2014 to May 2015) was presented to the company stipulating a tax obligation of € 2.4m. An immediate appeal was submitted to the Ministry of Finance as the findings are completely erroneous and unsubstantiated.

Sector Specific indicators (Oil & Gas G4 Sector Disclosures)

OG1

Volume and type of estimated proved reserves and production.

Not applicable, because the hydrocarbons exploration and production activity is out of the scope of this Report.

OG2

Total amount invested in renewable energy.

No new investments in 2015. 

OG3

Total amount of renewable energy generated by source.

Electricity produced by wind farm: 14,405 MWh

Electricity produced by P/V: 1,905 MWh

OG4

Number and percentage of significant operating sites, in which biodiversity risk has been assessed and monitored.

  p. 80

There are no such areas near industrial facilities of the Group. The Group undertakes voluntary initiatives to protect biodiversity in consultation with local communities and within its annual program of CSR activities. None of the Group’s refineries is near protected areas (NATURA, RAMSAR). All installations are in established industrial areas.

OG5

Volume of formation or produced water.

Not applicable, because the hydrocarbons exploration and production activity is out of the scope of this Report.

OG6

Volume of flared and vented hydrocarbon.

Gaseous fuel (hydrocarbons) flared at the refineries, based to the verified ETS reports:

Aspropyrgos refinery: 6,395,048 Νm3
Elefsina refinery : 31,792,051 Νm3
Thessaloniki refinery : 4,889,649 Νm3

 

Based on the GRI’s definition for vented hydrocarbon (ie intentional controlled release of uncombusted gas) there was no such release in 2015.

OG7

Amount of drilling waste (drill mud and cuttings) and strategies for treatment and disposal.

Not applicable, because the hydrocarbons exploration and production activity is out of the scope of this Report.

OG8

Benzene, lead and sulphur content in fuels

  Indicator G4-ΕΝ27

Supply of ‘’cleaner’’ fuels (zero sulfur), addition of bio-diesel to fuels, use of cleaner self-consumption fuels, as following (actual values less < or much less << than the specs):

 

Reduction of fuels sulfur content

Gasoline & diesel < 0.001%w/w (2015)

Aviation fuel < 0.30%w/w (2015)

Gas oil (heating)  <0.10%w/w (2015)

OG9

Operations where indigenous communities are present or affected by activities and where specific engagement strategies are in place.

No Group’s operations in/adjacent to indigenous peoples’ communities.

OG10

Number and description of significant disputes with local communities and indigenous peoples.

None.

OG11

Number of sites, that have been decommissioned and sites, that are in the process of being.

None/No such plans.

OG12

Operations where involuntary resettlement took place.

None.

OG13

Number of process safety events, by business activity.

 p. 46, 48, (Ch. “Human Capital”, Diagrams “Process Safety Incidents based on CONCAWE’s Definitions” and “process safety incident frequency, pser”)

The leakage on 08.05. 2015, during the general maintenance of Aspropyrgos refinery, marked the beginning of many actions to improve safety, such as the implementation of Holistic Safety System, inspection of all facilities by 3rd party’s experts, specific seminars "Supervising for safety" (in order improve operators’ safety culture), and others actions which are in process.

A category of oil leaks were spills or failures of third parties’ tankers during loading in the company's stations. All cases were investigated in depth and direct contacts and recommendations were made to the owners of the tankers. These were  followed by specific meetings of all loading stations supervisors, in Greece and abroad. The outcome was a program with additional actions which is under implementation.

OG14

Volume of biofuels produced and purchased meeting sustainability criteria.

 p. 86, (Ch. “Environment, Energy & Climate Change”, Section “Biofuels”, Table "Biodiesel received and used as a conventional diesel additive")

Total volume of biofuels purchased  112,680 million liters – no biofuels  production at HELPE.

The biofuels sustainability criteria and quantities are defined by the relevant authorities of the ministry of Energy according to Ministerial Degree 176374/18.05.2015, (see also State Gazette, 2nd issue, no. 911/ 19.05.15).

 
HELLENIC PETROLEUM SARegistered Address: 8A Chimarras str., 151 25-Maroussi/Greece
S.A. Registration Number.: 2443/06/B/86/23
Copyright © 2015 ELPE.All rights Reserved | Terms of use